Sunday, July 8, 2012

sex in the work place

interesting articule this raises some questions
"But if an alleged sexual harasser is in a position of authority he or she is deemed to be a "representative" of the employer and the behaviour is deemed to be that of the employer"
so its ok for senior staff members in some organsations to "screw the crew"
on occasion two  different crew members in the same night  and this perhaps predatory behaviour goes unchecked
interesting that he or she is deemed to be a "representative" of the employer and the behaviour is deemed to be that of the employer
i wonder if she included a performance review regading same and did they get a pay rise wonder which box was ticked  above expectations mmm?
time it was addressed me thinks maybe i will out them to senior mangement nah perhaps to the media

"Before taking action against an employee on the grounds of sexual harassment, an employer should ask themselves: "What could a fair and reasonable employer do in all the relevant circumstances?"
well well well  unfortunately when i was being disciplined before being exited form the company i was asked by my team leader at the time what i considered to be a suitable punishment for my misdemeanors
i replied considering a ccm and a team leader which i named got caught out screwing each other in company time in a small room on the sixth floor both where married but not to each other  i felt a verbal warning would suffice
the note taker of the meeting a representative from hr  failed to note this exchange  in the meeting note signed of by management as a true and correct record
interesting that aye i mean "What could a fair and reasonable employer do in all the relevant circumstances?"
well we all know the answer to that
question  do you think it was fair and resonable  i didnt

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/employment/news/article.cfm?c_id=11&objectid=10818004

Romance can soon lead to trouble


Tuesday, July 3, 2012

its now up to police commissiner


Remember it first went to the Prime Minster who passed it to the Minister of Police who is now passing it to the commissioner of police
What is of note is they are taken my complaint (Police file # 111129/9892) seriously otherwise they would have told me to piss off and stop wasting their time
What does the Police file contain?
A complaint of fraud against 5 people in Telecom, now who do think ...that might be

29 June 2012
Office of Hon Anne Tolley
MP for East Coast
Minister of Police
Minister of Corrections
Deputy Leader of the House

Mr Paul Evans-Mcleod
Paul.evans-mcleod©xtra.co.nz

Dear Mr Evans-Mcleod

The Hon Anne Tolley, Minister of Police, has asked me to acknowledge and thank you for your correspondence of 27 April 2012, transferred from the office of the Prime Minister and received by this office on 26 June 2012, concerning Police file # 111129/9892.

Your correspondence relates to matters that are the responsibility of the Commissioner of Police. I have therefore referred your correspondence to the office of the Commissioner of Police for consideration. You Will receive a response as soon as possible.

Detective Inspector Geoff Scott
Police Private Secretary

oh bugger aye