Telecom has a code of ethics unfortunately in my case ,the words on paper were clearly disconnected from the reality of the experience, nobody was interested in honesty and integrity just wasn’t a concept they were familiar with at all really , all had their own agenda, for their own selfish ends
You tell one lie you have to tell a thousand more to cover it all up
In the coming weeks as things slowly unfold you will find that four or five people will become very aware that there is no such thing as a minor breach of ethics you are either honest or your are not
They are now in the system, they cannot un ring the bell, the legal process now in play will find them wanting caught up in their own web of lies expressed in their own words
Saturday, September 18, 2010
Friday, September 17, 2010
tell it like it is
have just changed my label detailing the automatic deduction to telecom for payment of costs that appears on thier account to 30 pieces of silver CAUSE THOSE FUCKERS BETRAYED ME a little reminder for the next 50 weeks ON A WEEKLY BASIS
LIKE JUDAS THEY GOT EXPOSED FOR WHAT THEY REALLY ARE
LIKE JUDAS THEY GOT EXPOSED FOR WHAT THEY REALLY ARE
the tide has turned
It has been an interesting couple of days but at last the stress as gone i have just had it confirmed by a very reliable source that they have breached the law
These four people had their heads so far up their own arses that they made some bad mistakes they have been getting away with it for so long they believed their position of power would protected them and a forced mediation would be the end of it
They thought no one would challenge them, that they knew the rules and the law better than anybody else wrong wrong wrong wrong
As soon as i saw that i was being micro managed i knew they were targeting me so after i stormed off the site i calmed down an thought it thru
Realised my job was gone Realised someone was conducting a personal vendetta against me , Realised what i was up against, and laid trap after trap
I warned them three times back off don’t do this don’t take me for a fool because I’m not all the while stepping them thru my carefully laid plan
YOU SHOULD HAVE WORKED IT OUT RIGHT AT THE START WITH THE NAME OF MY BLOG
THE CLUE WAS STARING YOU IN THE FACE YOU WERE TO ARROGANT TO SPOT IT
BECAUSE THAT ALL I HAVE DONE IS
HOISTED YOU WITH YOUR OWN PETARD
YOU DID IT TO YOURSELVES
Well three of you are well fucked now and I’m working on the fourth
power doesn’t develop character it displays it
Your jobs are gone it is quite simply all a matter of time best you resign now
telecom is going to drop you like hot coals your acts of dishonesty and lack of integrity are going to follow you all the days of your lives
Warren Buffet said “ you find out who’s swimming naked when the tide goes out” well you fuckers the tide is on the turn IT NOT GOING TO BE A PRETTY SIGHT
You have no one to blame but yourselves and your lack of honesty and integrity your own moral compass put you on the wrong path and now you are on the rocks
Am i gloating you betcha
Don’t fuck with old people that have time on their hands especially me
These four people had their heads so far up their own arses that they made some bad mistakes they have been getting away with it for so long they believed their position of power would protected them and a forced mediation would be the end of it
They thought no one would challenge them, that they knew the rules and the law better than anybody else wrong wrong wrong wrong
As soon as i saw that i was being micro managed i knew they were targeting me so after i stormed off the site i calmed down an thought it thru
Realised my job was gone Realised someone was conducting a personal vendetta against me , Realised what i was up against, and laid trap after trap
I warned them three times back off don’t do this don’t take me for a fool because I’m not all the while stepping them thru my carefully laid plan
YOU SHOULD HAVE WORKED IT OUT RIGHT AT THE START WITH THE NAME OF MY BLOG
THE CLUE WAS STARING YOU IN THE FACE YOU WERE TO ARROGANT TO SPOT IT
BECAUSE THAT ALL I HAVE DONE IS
HOISTED YOU WITH YOUR OWN PETARD
YOU DID IT TO YOURSELVES
Well three of you are well fucked now and I’m working on the fourth
power doesn’t develop character it displays it
Your jobs are gone it is quite simply all a matter of time best you resign now
telecom is going to drop you like hot coals your acts of dishonesty and lack of integrity are going to follow you all the days of your lives
Warren Buffet said “ you find out who’s swimming naked when the tide goes out” well you fuckers the tide is on the turn IT NOT GOING TO BE A PRETTY SIGHT
You have no one to blame but yourselves and your lack of honesty and integrity your own moral compass put you on the wrong path and now you are on the rocks
Am i gloating you betcha
Don’t fuck with old people that have time on their hands especially me
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Request for postponement aproved
The Authority Member, Ken Anderson has asked me to relay the following message in reply to the applicant's request for a postponement of today's conference call.
"The Authority is in receipt of a letter from Mr Evans-McLeod attached to an email dated 12th September 2010. Additionally, there is a letter from the office of the Privacy Commissioner dated 3rd September 2010. Having perused this correspondence, it seems appropriate that the conference call set down for 2:00p.m. today is postponed, and the investigation of the Authority is suspended.
While at this stage in the proceedings, the Authority is unaware of the relevance of the information that Mr Evans-McLeod is seeking from Telecom (via the office of the Privacy Commissioner), the preliminary view of the Authority is that Mr Evans-McLeod may have some difficulty in regard to surmounting the jurisdictional barrier that currently appears to exist. Perhaps he may wish to seek professional advice about the merits of his application (and possible costs implications) before proceeding further within the Authority."
Telecom will be well aware shortly as there is a very very very high probablilty that they may have lied to the privacy commssioner heads will have to roll on that one im afraid more on that as information comes to hand
how do i know because in they acted with honour and intregrity as required by thier own code of ethics (A) should have occurred it didnt so (B) MUST HAVE SO THEY ARE TELLING POKIES
have recieved notice that they have finally complied with the privacy commissioner requests it
as for
the preliminary view of the Authority is that Mr Evans-McLeod may have some difficulty in regard to surmounting the jurisdictional barrier that currently appears to exist. Perhaps he may wish to seek professional advice about the merits of his application (and possible costs implications) before proceeding further within the Authority."
thanks very much for the heads up
have now got some lawyers across it helping me out pro bono that laywer speak meaning its free yippeee one is very interested in the case,
as disccussed with a friend to day it is surprising the people who will help if you ask in the right way very interested in my blog ,my efforts and the unquie angle i am approaching it with
oh yeah had a mediation meeting with telecom today do NOT ask me any questions all confidential not allowed to discuss it
"The Authority is in receipt of a letter from Mr Evans-McLeod attached to an email dated 12th September 2010. Additionally, there is a letter from the office of the Privacy Commissioner dated 3rd September 2010. Having perused this correspondence, it seems appropriate that the conference call set down for 2:00p.m. today is postponed, and the investigation of the Authority is suspended.
While at this stage in the proceedings, the Authority is unaware of the relevance of the information that Mr Evans-McLeod is seeking from Telecom (via the office of the Privacy Commissioner), the preliminary view of the Authority is that Mr Evans-McLeod may have some difficulty in regard to surmounting the jurisdictional barrier that currently appears to exist. Perhaps he may wish to seek professional advice about the merits of his application (and possible costs implications) before proceeding further within the Authority."
Telecom will be well aware shortly as there is a very very very high probablilty that they may have lied to the privacy commssioner heads will have to roll on that one im afraid more on that as information comes to hand
how do i know because in they acted with honour and intregrity as required by thier own code of ethics (A) should have occurred it didnt so (B) MUST HAVE SO THEY ARE TELLING POKIES
have recieved notice that they have finally complied with the privacy commissioner requests it
as for
the preliminary view of the Authority is that Mr Evans-McLeod may have some difficulty in regard to surmounting the jurisdictional barrier that currently appears to exist. Perhaps he may wish to seek professional advice about the merits of his application (and possible costs implications) before proceeding further within the Authority."
thanks very much for the heads up
have now got some lawyers across it helping me out pro bono that laywer speak meaning its free yippeee one is very interested in the case,
as disccussed with a friend to day it is surprising the people who will help if you ask in the right way very interested in my blog ,my efforts and the unquie angle i am approaching it with
oh yeah had a mediation meeting with telecom today do NOT ask me any questions all confidential not allowed to discuss it
Request for postponement
Request for postponement
To the employment relations authority
Under section 221 of the Employment Relations act 2000
I respectfully request a postponement of the conference call between the parties scheduled for 2pm Monday 13 September and an extension of time in regards to the matter before it namely File number 5315212 Paul Alan Evans-McLeod Applicant, Telecom New Zealand Respondent
To enable the authority to more effectually dispose of the matter before it according to the substantial merits and equities of the case I had the intention of providing substantive details which in part was/were dependant on the findings of the Privacy commissioner in a case before it (their reference c 122243) relevant to the current proceedings
I had every expectation of the documents being available unfortunately at the time of filing I was unaware that Telecom had requested of the Privacy Commissioner and been granted, an extension of time
Unfortunately as supported by the attached letter from the investigating officer Sarah Thompson, her office is still awaiting further information from Telecom and she is unable at this point to confirm an exact time when it may become available
The outcome may or may not have great relevance as to your determination regarding such matters as jurisdiction, matters as under section 68 regarding unfair bargaining and whether good faith obligations imposed by the act have been complied with
And whether I was induced to enter the agreement and mediation by oppressive means, undue influence or duress with regards to the fairness of the disciplinary procedures/actions used against me
Indeed the rulings of the privacy commissioner and any subsequent agency such as the human rights commissioner who may or may not become involved may possibly negate the requirement for the employment relations authority to be involved
Thus the request for an extension is lodged so all parties can make such directions as are necessary or expedient in the circumstances
To the employment relations authority
Under section 221 of the Employment Relations act 2000
I respectfully request a postponement of the conference call between the parties scheduled for 2pm Monday 13 September and an extension of time in regards to the matter before it namely File number 5315212 Paul Alan Evans-McLeod Applicant, Telecom New Zealand Respondent
To enable the authority to more effectually dispose of the matter before it according to the substantial merits and equities of the case I had the intention of providing substantive details which in part was/were dependant on the findings of the Privacy commissioner in a case before it (their reference c 122243) relevant to the current proceedings
I had every expectation of the documents being available unfortunately at the time of filing I was unaware that Telecom had requested of the Privacy Commissioner and been granted, an extension of time
Unfortunately as supported by the attached letter from the investigating officer Sarah Thompson, her office is still awaiting further information from Telecom and she is unable at this point to confirm an exact time when it may become available
The outcome may or may not have great relevance as to your determination regarding such matters as jurisdiction, matters as under section 68 regarding unfair bargaining and whether good faith obligations imposed by the act have been complied with
And whether I was induced to enter the agreement and mediation by oppressive means, undue influence or duress with regards to the fairness of the disciplinary procedures/actions used against me
Indeed the rulings of the privacy commissioner and any subsequent agency such as the human rights commissioner who may or may not become involved may possibly negate the requirement for the employment relations authority to be involved
Thus the request for an extension is lodged so all parties can make such directions as are necessary or expedient in the circumstances
my mantra
Let the first act of every morning be to make the following resolve for the day:
I shall not fear anyone on earth.
I shall fear only God.
I shall not bear ill toward anyone.
I shall not submit to injustice from anyone.
I shall conquer untruth by truth.
And in resisting untruth I shall put up with all suffering.
Mahatma Gandhi
I shall not fear anyone on earth.
I shall fear only God.
I shall not bear ill toward anyone.
I shall not submit to injustice from anyone.
I shall conquer untruth by truth.
And in resisting untruth I shall put up with all suffering.
Mahatma Gandhi
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
telecoms a pedantic bully
all correspondance as per above post removed at the request of telecom
Dear john
Done
Warm regards
Paul
From: John Rooney [mailto:John.Rooney@simpsongrierson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 14 September 2010 5:33 p.m.
To: 'Paul Mcleod'
Subject: Telecom - Without Prejudice Correspondence [SGDMS.FID361431]
Dear Paul,
It has come to Telecom's attention that on your blog you have posted without prejudice correspondence between yourself and Telecom. The correspondence relates to Telecom's application for a compliance order and the parties' attempts to agree on terms to resolve the payment of the costs award. This correspondence is privileged and confidential to the parties. Telecom has not and does not consent to its disclosure to any other person or to its publication. Telecom therefore requires the immediate removal of all of without prejudice correspondence from your blog. Can you please confirm this will be done.
Regards
John Rooney
Partner
Simpson Grierson
Level 27,88 Shortland Street, Private Bag 92518
Auckland, New Zealand, DX CX 10092
DDI: +64 9 977 5070
Fax: +64 9 977 5083
john.rooney@simpsongrierson.com
www.simpsongrierson.com
and as per the committment made by myself on commencing blog
Disclosure The writer of this blog holds no liability or responsibility for the views ,opinions, thoughts ,and statements added by any and all other participants in this blog and any others that may be added at sometime in the future I'm a mellow easy going friendly person, happy to help anybody with anything if it will make their life just a little easier, but you fuck me over, I rarely forgive and never ever forget any body that feels inpugned or tarnished or believes any statement is untrue, or unjust, is free to comment or request the withdrawal of any comments; provided they can offer proof to substandiate their arguement They can leave comments as long as any allegations listed can be supported
Dear john
Done
Warm regards
Paul
From: John Rooney [mailto:John.Rooney@simpsongrierson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 14 September 2010 5:33 p.m.
To: 'Paul Mcleod'
Subject: Telecom - Without Prejudice Correspondence [SGDMS.FID361431]
Dear Paul,
It has come to Telecom's attention that on your blog you have posted without prejudice correspondence between yourself and Telecom. The correspondence relates to Telecom's application for a compliance order and the parties' attempts to agree on terms to resolve the payment of the costs award. This correspondence is privileged and confidential to the parties. Telecom has not and does not consent to its disclosure to any other person or to its publication. Telecom therefore requires the immediate removal of all of without prejudice correspondence from your blog. Can you please confirm this will be done.
Regards
John Rooney
Partner
Simpson Grierson
Level 27,88 Shortland Street, Private Bag 92518
Auckland, New Zealand, DX CX 10092
DDI: +64 9 977 5070
Fax: +64 9 977 5083
john.rooney@simpsongrierson.com
www.simpsongrierson.com
and as per the committment made by myself on commencing blog
Disclosure The writer of this blog holds no liability or responsibility for the views ,opinions, thoughts ,and statements added by any and all other participants in this blog and any others that may be added at sometime in the future I'm a mellow easy going friendly person, happy to help anybody with anything if it will make their life just a little easier, but you fuck me over, I rarely forgive and never ever forget any body that feels inpugned or tarnished or believes any statement is untrue, or unjust, is free to comment or request the withdrawal of any comments; provided they can offer proof to substandiate their arguement They can leave comments as long as any allegations listed can be supported
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)