teIecom
To: The Board of Directors
From:
Date: 08 June 2010
Subject: Disgruntled former employee - Paul Evans-McLeod
No an employee who doesn’t like people that act without honesty or integrity
The purpose of this memorandum is to advise you of a communication addressed to you from the above individual, which you may be unaware of. Mr Evans-McLeod has posted the attached letter to you on his publicly accessible blog site http://blogspot.com/.
Yes completely correct the board is fully supportive of the telecoms code of ethics indeed they authorized them see previous post I was endevouring to alert them to some perhaps unsavory events
You may not have received this letter, as we have blocked emails from Mr Evans-McLeod’s email address to almost all Telecom addresses, due to multiple concerns with his communications. We wish to bring this particular communication to your attention given his threat to go public and involve the media.
Absolutely I will awaiting for events to unfold refer latest blogs there exists a very strong possibility they may have lied to the privacy commission
The relevant background to this matter is as follows:
• Mr Evans-McLeod was employed by Telecom for 39 years, and 3months most recently as a Customer Services Representative in its Hamilton Call Centre.
• Mr Evans-McLeod was subject to performance management from November 2008 until the time of termination of his employment in August 2009, by which time he had received one formal written warning and attended a second disciplinary meeting in relation to his performance.
Read my previous blogs they micromanaged me they are now denying the micromanagement unfortunately I have diary notes and witnesses’ and the wankers admitted it twice
They have also refused to release to me the disciplinary procedures what happened to the first verbal warning second verbal warning third verbal warning ,first written warning second written warning duh
• Mr Evans-McLeod was represented in both performance discussions and the two disciplinary meetings by a representative of the EPMU.
Correct
• Through his union representative Mr Evans-McLeod raised a personal grievance and requested that Telecom attend voluntary mediation.
After I informed them they where possibility in breach of the 2002 health and safety amendment act and personally libel for a $500.000.000 fine and three years imprisonment they shat themselves and issued a final written warning to exit me quick smart a personal grievance was my only recourse left
• Following mediation on 17 August, which was facilitated by the Department of Labour, the parties signed a settlement agreement on 21 August (countersigned by a mediator from the Department of Labour on 24 August) and Mr Evans-McLeod’s resigned from his employment effective 21 August 2009.
The mediation was confidential but I became aware at a much later stage that they had blacklisted me within 15 days of my “resignation” read previous blogs unfortunately telecom failed the “good faith” component required under my contract idiots
• In December 2009, Mr Evans-McLeod sought to enter into correspondence with Paul Reynolds regarding the subject matter of the mediation and events surrounding the mediation. , replied on Paul’s behalf and pointed out thatthe mediated settlement agreement was in full and final settlement of all matters relating to Mr Evans-McLeod’s employment and it was not permissible to seek to re¬litigate matters.
• Subsequently, in February 2010, Mr Evans-McLeod sought to raise a personal grievance claim in the Employment Relations Authority. Telecom successfully argued that Mr Evans-McLeod’s claim was statute barred and obtained costs against Mr Evans-McLeod.
Read posts re repayment costs etc
• Mr Evans-McLeod has previously contacted the media, resulting in a brief article in the Dominion Post and has also written to the Prime Minister’s Office, the Minister of Labour and the Ombudsman.
Correct and a lot of others as well although telecom has yet to recognize the intent of these actions
• He has now raised a complaint with the Privacy Commissioner that Telecom has breached certain principles of the Privacy Act. We are confident this complaint will not be upheld.
Well we shall see but if they are so confident why did they withhold documents necessitating a second request for them plus as per above they may not have been completely honest with the privacy commissioner silly people
• Mr Evans-McLeod has not been represented by the EPMU since August 2009 and is acting as a litigant in person.
Correct cause its much cheaper then lawyers and it’s been a great learning experience their consul mr john Rooney puts me straight if I inadvertently overstep the mark I bear him no animosity what so ever he is just telecoms agent in this matter and under instruction from telecom
Since becoming aware of Mr Evans-McLeod’s letter to you, we have again requested that he not contact any Telecom officer or employee directly regarding the issues he has with Telecom and that all such correspondence be directed to our solicitors Simpson Grierson. We do not consider that a response from you is necessary, but wanted to give you an informed choice in the matter, as Mr Evans-McLeod is both determined and persistent in his attempts to find a forum to discuss his grievances. If you would like further
background information please contact . •and I
,‘ in the Media Relations team are also familiar with this matter should you wish to consult about a response.
Page 2 of 2 Memo to Board PE-M (final)
Will it be the final memo to the board no once i have the substantive evidence i require this letter will be returned to the board a full explanation of what really went on supported by affidavits witness statements etc etc
IT IS EASY TO WORK OUT THE WRITER OF THIS MEMO AS THE USUAL TRAITS OF LAZINESS AND NOT QUITE TELLING THE FULL STORY ARE APPARENT WITHIN
SHOWS YOU HOW SPINELESS THE HR PEOPLE ARE HAPPY TO BAG YOU TO ALL BUT LACK THE GUTS TO LEAVE THIER NAME ON PAPER
NEVER MIND THE BOARD WILL KNOW THIER NAMES WHEN THE THEY ARE THE LEAD STORY IN THE MEDIA
am i worried about going to court no not one bit in fact i cant wait as it will provide a forum to trap them once again telling lies only this time it will be called perjury and that carries a punishment called jail
wots jail 3 hots and a cot i can cathc up on my reading
Being challenged in life is inevitable, being defeated is optional
I shall not fear anyone on earth.
I shall fear only God.
I shall not bear ill toward anyone.
I shall not submit to injustice from anyone.
I shall conquer untruth by truth.
And in resisting untruth I shall put up with all suffering.
Mahatma Gandhi
No comments:
Post a Comment