THREATENED WITH JAIL 3 HOTS AND A COT

This blog has been in play for some months. To gain the full story, go to left hand side "blog archive" go to bottom post of January with same title as this Blog and read upwards
Current telecom participants
Bridgette Dalzell current head of outsourced customer care at telecom New Zealand whom is Michelle Young's direct report at time of incident
Michelle Young call center manager Hamilton call center, whom is Shaun Hoults direct report at time of incidents
Shaun Hoult team manager weekend team Sat-Tues Hamilton
Iain Galloway HR representative spends a lot of time in Hamilton

Era not happy at all I am required to pay outstanding debt by end of November or go to jail
3 hots and a cot oh bugger
IN THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY AUCKLAND


AA 388A110


5311630


BETWEEN TELECOM NEW ZEALAND


LIMITED


Applicant

AND PAUL EVANS-MCLEOD


Respondent






Member of Authority: Vicki Campbell



Investigation: On the Papers






Submissions received: 27 and 30 September 2010 from Respondent



Determination: 22 October 2010


DETERMINATION OF THE AUTHORITY

[1] On 26 August 2010 I issued a determination’ the result of which was to send the parties to mediation to resolve the issue as to how and when the Authority’s decision as to costs would be met by the respondent. I gave leave to the parties to return to the Authority in the event that mediation was unsuccessful.

YES THAT’S CORRECT ON BOTH COUNTS



[2] On 22 September Telecom New Zealand Limited (“Telecom”) advised the Authority that mediation had not been successful and requested the Authority to finalise the compliance order as to payment of costs2. Mr Evans-McLeod was invited to make submissions on the issue. I have found Mr Evans-McLeod’s comments to be unhelpful in assisting the Authority to resolve the matter of the compliance with the Authority’s determination.




THAT WAS ONLY IN THEIR VIEW IN MY VIEW IT WAS EMINENTLY SUCCESSFUL WHICH IS WHY  MY COMMENTS WHERE UNHELPFUL

[3] Telecom was awarded costs in the sum of $1500 plus disbursements of $401.48. The full payment of the costs award has not been paid by Mr


McLeod who has, instead, been paying Telecom incremental amounts each week up to $10.00 per week.

INCORRECT I HAVE BEEN PAYING $28.84 A WEEK FOR THE LAST EIGHT WEEKS JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF SLOPPY INFORMATION PASSED ON BY TELECOM INSTRUCTION PERSON I KEEP CATCHING THIS PERSON OUT SO NO SUPRISES THERE



[4] 1 repeat here the comments I made in my previous determination which is that parties who take claims to the Authority or the Court do so with the risk that if they are not successful there may be financial consequences in that the unsuccessful party may have to contribute to the costs of the successful party.

YES THAT IS CORRECT I ACCEPTED THAT HOWEVER THERE WAS NO MENTION OF THE “QUANTUM AND TIMING OF THE PAYMENT REFER EARLIER POSTS





[5] Mr Evans-McLeod says the Authority has no jurisdiction in this matter as he has now entered into a contract with Telecom which has been accepted through performance, to pay by way of incremental payments. That submission flies in the face of the facts which show that Telecom have continually sought payment of the costs amount in full.

AGAIN THE AUTHORITY GAVE NO INDICATION OF QUANTUM AND TIMING OF PAYMENTS SO AT THAT PIONT IT ALLOWED ME TO SCHEUDLE MY OWN PAYMENTS WHICH TELECOM TOOK EXCEPTION TO OH DEAR

DISAGREE  MY STANCE HAS TO DO WITH A CONCEPT IN CONTRACT LAW CALLED ACCORD AND SATISFACTION NOTE THEY HAVENT LISTED ANY PRECEDENTS IN LAW TO SUPPORT THIER ARGUEMENT

YES TELECOM HAS ALWAYS WANTED PAYMENT IN FULL BUT THEY FORCED ME OUT THEN BLACKLISTED ME WHICH LEFT ME ON THE DOLE  SO WHERE WAS THE MONEY COMING FROM

SHOWS YOU HOW VINDICTIVE AND PEDANTIC AND NASTY THEY ARE
THIS BULLSHIT HAS COST THEM $50.000.00 SO FAR ME $2100 THEY ARE PISSED OFF I AM REPRESENTING MYSELF AND I KEEP FINDING THEM WANTING IN TERMS OF HONESTY AND INTEGRITY


THE ERA IS SWAMPED AS EMPLOYERS ARE BEING HELD TO ACCOUNT MORE AND MORE OFTEN BY EMPLOYEE THERE IS NOW A SIX MONTH WAIT



[6] In coming to my conclusions in this matter I have taken into account the fact that continuing defiance of the Authority’s orders places Mr Evans-McLeod at peril of serious consequences. The Authority’s orders may be the subject of a further application for compliance in the Employment Court which is empowered to impose penalties for continuing non-compliance which include imprisonment, fines and the sequestration of property.

ALL MY PROPERTY AND CHATTELS HAVE BEEN SOLD QUITE SOME TIME AGO SO GOOD LUCK WITH THAT  ME THINKS






I order Mr Evans-McLeod to comply with the Authority’s Determination numbered AA 187A/1O dated 1 June 2010, and to do so by 26 November 2010.





Costs



[7] Costs relating to this application shall lie where they fall.



MEANS NOBODY HAS TO PAY COSTS


telecom and its instruction agent havent a clue what im doing and why. i let them keep wondering so where to now
well still have to wait for the privacy commissioner and human rights commissioners  report then i hold them accountable again THIS BIT WILL COST PEOPLE THIER JOBS AND TELECOM THIER IMAGE AND A LARGE AMOUNT OF MONEY IF IT COMES OUT ON MY SIDE  COST TO ME ZERO

GET THE IDEA I DONT QUIT AND NOW I HAVE A FEATURE WRITER OF A NATIONAL DAILY ON BOARD

FUCK EM THEY DESERVE WHATS COMING THEY BROUGHT IT ON THEMSELVES WITH THIER DISHONEST BEHAVIOUR