synopsis

Hi Paul

Lets see if I have got it right

<You were forced to resign or be dismissed and you decided to resign . correct resigning looks better than dismissed on a cv

I assume you received a lump sum for resigning  .correct I got resigning leave they were so thick they didn’t realise I was entitled to it

<Your entire management team and human recourses manager ganged up on you yes I went thru privacy commission to get details  sequence went like this   six weeks after returning from hospital after a heart attack called into office re work product .

r rightly so as I was angry that company failed completely to do anything of substance for me during period off work

.told boss off admitted error of ways and improved  boss acknowledged improvement I thought situation resolved

<Sometime later called into site managers office she wanted to go over misdemeanours all over again

Advise her situation resolved to both mine and team leaders satisfaction action I can’t get told off penalised twice for same offense

<Site manager didn’t like being challenged >Two weeks later in meeting with national manager  and hr rep from head office national manager wanted to go over misdemeanours all over again advise her the same as site manager all sorted i can’t get told off penalised twice for same offense

<Two weeks later called in to performance management meeting  micro-managed retrospectively back four months in minute detail that in itself is illegal

<Fought them for 8 and half months caught them with pants down re health safety issues

<They panicked and issued me with final written warning forced mediation forced resignation

<Found out that all managers had attended a “boot camp” as site was failing across board their resolution   sack one from every team to send clear message across work place team leaders told do whatever  hr would back them to hilt  

<Two weeks after I had “resigned “  the stamped my file de not re-employ effectively a restraint of trade as telecommunications is all I know

<!Your manger was the one who committed fraud correct

<He told other people that a customer had complained about you in writing but no such letter existed. Correct this fact was repeated constantly in

Disciplinary meetings and signed off as a true and correct record by site manager  

Suggestions

I’m not sue how you can prove that there was a plot to get rid of you by the entire management team refer sequence above

Your manager did not commit fraud as such but he did commit an act of deception by leading you and other people to believe that a customer had complained about you which was false

I would like to know how your manager went about the deception did he do it in writing or just verbally? Refer above incident was related to the way I I handled a call with and ihc girl .manager advised that she had written a letter indicating I was “condescending patronising and rude “ I realised at that point all was lost  they were blatantly lying to me  there is no way an ihc person would understand the concept of condersending and patronising  let alone spell it or covey it  to a third party

If he did it in writing then you need to concentrate on suing your manager and don’t get bogged down in other side issues  : trying to telecom has employed a top lawyer  John Rooney from Simpson Grierson  these dudes are up there Russell McVeigh very heavy hitters 

Telecom uses it deep pockets to pound the crap of you few can afforded to litigate against them

                So I have been fighting using various ways of getting government agencies to the work for me hence all the letters

                Plus I keep trapping them lying to me so hence all the posts on my blog its called “hoist with your own petard “old English saying which essentially

                Translates as destroying yourself with your own weapon

                 I post all their correspondence on blog  advise old friends in telecom of same on face book  late Sunday by mid Monday it right across telecom

               

                They got really heavy and tried to threaten me with defamation              

                My reply was hamlet act three scene two or some such” the lady doth protest to much “

                Plus I highlighted theirs lies written in their own hand and said bring it on they promptly backed down

            any determination on the fraud will send shock waves thru telecom as well as the employment world as it will require any disciplinary action to be        absolutely word perfect

                It will mean a full audit of telecom hr and the era will be flooded with appeals

               

Keep in touch but keep it simple and keep reading my articles on Ronnie’s Blog  will do And thanks for listening  the whole system is corrupt it can be made hard on both the employer and the employee it like a divorce court the only winners are the lawyers   it is just a big rort  disguised as  the law

                It is impossible to get justice it doesn’t exist you just get the law applied and that manipulated constantly  I would not be surprised if the have templates of legal who har and they just change the name of the participants

Regards

Ron B