telecom fucked it up badly this time so good i decided such stupidy needed media coverage
so i sent this off to the various agencies
"Is this story of interest to you
...
Editor /senior management
I have a major scoop for you
Synopsis
I placed a compliant via telecom whistleblower site
Telecom referred the complaint to the very lawyer that formed part of the complaint
MY REPLY TO THIER LAWYER
Under the Protected Disclosures Act, it appears that Telecom is in breach of section 19 of the act amongst others.
“19 Confidentiality states
• (1) Every person to whom a protected disclosure is made or referred must use his or her best endeavours not to disclose information that might identify the person who made the protected disclosure unless—
o (a) that person consents in writing to the disclosure of that information; or
o (b) the person who has acquired knowledge of the protected disclosure reasonably believes that disclosure of identifying information—
(i) is essential to the effective investigation of the allegations in the protected disclosure; or
(ii) is essential to prevent serious risk to public health or public safety or the environment; or
(iii) is essential having regard to the principles of natural justice
I did not provide for written consent.
I am thus more than a little surprised that, as yourself is mentioned within my submission, that you should have such immediate access...”
translation
i followed the diclosure procedures of the act they didnt and they now in deep deep dogy doo
they where in such a hurry to close me off and shut me down for contiuing to question the fraud perpetuated in my dissmissal they completely failed to regonise the requirement of the protected disclosuse act
and part of telecoms codes of conduct are that you are responsible for keeping your self up to date with all laws
telecom fucked it up badly this time so good i decided such stupidy needed media coverage
so i sent this off to the various agencies
"Is this story of interest to you
...
so i sent this off to the various agencies
"Is this story of interest to you
...
Editor /senior management
I have a major scoop for you
Synopsis
I placed a compliant via telecom whistleblower site
Telecom referred the complaint to the very lawyer that formed part of the complaint
MY REPLY TO THIER LAWYER
Under the Protected Disclosures Act, it appears that Telecom is in breach of section 19 of the act amongst others.
“19 Confidentiality states
• (1) Every person to whom a protected disclosure is made or referred must use his or her best endeavours not to disclose information that might identify the person who made the protected disclosure unless—
o (a) that person consents in writing to the disclosure of that information; or
o (b) the person who has acquired knowledge of the protected disclosure reasonably believes that disclosure of identifying information—
(i) is essential to the effective investigation of the allegations in the protected disclosure; or
(ii) is essential to prevent serious risk to public health or public safety or the environment; or
(iii) is essential having regard to the principles of natural justice
I did not provide for written consent.
I am thus more than a little surprised that, as yourself is mentioned within my submission, that you should have such immediate access...”
translation
i followed the diclosure procedures of the act they didnt and they now in deep deep dogy doo
they where in such a hurry to close me off and shut me down for contiuing to question the fraud perpetuated in my dissmissal they completely failed to regonise the requirement of the protected disclosuse act
and part of telecoms codes of conduct are that you are responsible for keeping your self up to date with all laws
I have a major scoop for you
Synopsis
I placed a compliant via telecom whistleblower site
Telecom referred the complaint to the very lawyer that formed part of the complaint
MY REPLY TO THIER LAWYER
Under the Protected Disclosures Act, it appears that Telecom is in breach of section 19 of the act amongst others.
“19 Confidentiality states
• (1) Every person to whom a protected disclosure is made or referred must use his or her best endeavours not to disclose information that might identify the person who made the protected disclosure unless—
o (a) that person consents in writing to the disclosure of that information; or
o (b) the person who has acquired knowledge of the protected disclosure reasonably believes that disclosure of identifying information—
(i) is essential to the effective investigation of the allegations in the protected disclosure; or
(ii) is essential to prevent serious risk to public health or public safety or the environment; or
(iii) is essential having regard to the principles of natural justice
I did not provide for written consent.
I am thus more than a little surprised that, as yourself is mentioned within my submission, that you should have such immediate access...”
translation
i followed the diclosure procedures of the act they didnt and they now in deep deep dogy doo
they where in such a hurry to close me off and shut me down for contiuing to question the fraud perpetuated in my dissmissal they completely failed to regonise the requirement of the protected disclosuse act
and part of telecoms codes of conduct are that you are responsible for keeping your self up to date with all laws
No comments:
Post a Comment