Things have reached a interesting stage.with telecom
The simplicity of the scenario is as below.
Telecom has a set of ethics and guidelines that all are held to account to, including the board.
Richard Lowe, Senior fraud investigator no less, has acknowledged that written complaints used in my disciplinary action do not exit
(Note: Having now identified the fraud and false declarations, surely his job description and ethics (both personal and Telecoms) require him to act )
Some of the five participants involved in this sham disciplinary action, Shaun Holt, Michelle Young, Bridgette Dalzell, Ian Galloway, Hannah Sullivan attested to these written complaints in meeting notes sworn off as true and correct (another act of fraud to compound the first act), then using same, they knowingly entered into a mediation conference with myself, the conclusion of the disciplinary procedure, another abuse of employment laws and process and numerous acts of parliament.
So when placing my petition before the house of representatives, requesting the documents , jointly and severally of both Telecom and the above named participants, (and now Richard Lowe),their individual replies to Parliament will be scrutinised. Richard Lowe will no doubt cross check the documentation, and identify further deliberate omissions from the meeting notes, and discrepancies between the participants. All of which will become part of the parliamentary record...and the irony of it all, all levels of management and all participants had multiple times to put it right, they had the knowledge due to my constant correspondence with all parites
and yet they falied to act.
no fun being micr-managed is it
No comments:
Post a Comment