Procedural requirement

Procedural requirement

Dear Debbie /Trish

You will be well aware that my pursuit for a resolution to the illegal act, a fraud , the nonexistence of a customer complaint which assisted my exit from telecom continues ..

It concludes with a petition to the house of representatives.
The presentation of the petition requires certain perquisites.
These I have been carefully fulfilling, this letter, is effectively the penultimate step.
To summarise the salient points.
• I have documentation from the Minster of Labour acknowledging it is a crime and advising me to take it to the police or the serious fraud office.
• I am in receipt of a police complaint number regarding same.
Persuaded, not by what is just, but by the law
To achieve this end they have accepted nothing, believed no one and asked me to corroborate everything, which I have done
I already have
• the required full support of a sitting  MP
• this results in my concerns to be expressed on the floor of the houses of parliament under privilege.
The petition will detail, all those with whom the issue has been raised,you are now  aware of  the reasoning behind my prolific entreaties to all and sundry both within and outside of Telecom  inclusive of the CEO both past and present and the board.

It relates to the fraud, not to the mediation process, that avenue being statue based , is not an option.

Bridgette Dalzell has stated in previous correspondence, she had every confidence in the integrity of  Michelle Young and Shaun Hoult
Feel free to bet your future on Bridgette’s judgment ( in reality nothing would give me more pleasure)

You both once had my respect, confidence, and trust.
No more, documentation sourced via the privacy act show me, this was misplaced.

Telecoms lawyer John Rooney at one point in this travesty attempted to scare me off with defamation.
It was not pursued, when, I advised the documentation signed off by the participants as true and correct records could be shown as not so, and the number of witnesses that I would call.
I was being set up and lied to ..realizing the outcome was predetermined and premeditated, I successfully gained corroboration.
The complaint from the intellectually handicapped person never existed, a document and evidence trail , can not be produced.
This will, if necessary require her, to substantiate same within the appropriate parliamentary process.

This letter provides for an opportunity for my concerns to be addressed, you may choose to respond.
I’m really not bothered whether I get taken seriously or not  I am just fulfilling the requirements of the process and documenting same.

I will no longer respond to any correspondence from  telecoms lawyer as,
• there is nothing in law that precludes me from exercising my democratic right
• the process requires me that all  information be substantiated and corroborated that has been achieved
Regards

Paul

Paul Evans-McLeod
17 Minnie Place
Pukete
Te Rapa
Hamilton
New Zealand

Phone 0064 7 8494584
Mobile 0272423222
Paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz




Be very aware  some if not all of the names below are the subject of a still open complaint for fraud with the Hamilton police

Bridgette Dalzell :current head of outsourced customer care at telecom New Zealand whom is Michelle Young's direct report at time of incident



Michelle Young :call centre manager Hamilton call centre, whom is Shaun Hoults direct report at time of incidents



Shaun Hoult: team manager weekend team Sat-Tues Hamilton



Iain Galloway HR representative for in Hamilton



Hannah Sullivan HR representative head office