to be clear i rang nigel and asked that he pretend to be my lawyer all emails between us where formatted as thought it was client lawyer correspondance
which should have been confidential
by no hr think the are a law unto them selves
Hannah Sullivan
From: Richard Lowe
Sent: Wednesday, 26 August 2009 7:59 a.m.
To: Hannah Sullivan
Subject: FW: well well well
From: Paul Evans-Mcleod
Sent: Wednesday, 11 March 2009 3:29 p.m.
To: paul.evans-mcleod©xtra.co.nz
Subject: FW: well well well
From: Paul Evans-Mcleod
Sent: Mon 3/9/2009 7:35 AM
To: Nigel Dick (nigel.dick@xtra.co.nz)
Subject: well well well
Hi nigel
I had a sleep on the events of yesterday an have decided that at the first hint of a disciplinary I’m going to hit
them between their eyes with a few home truths from around here
Such as 1 managers turning up drunk two other managers had to leave the floor and escort her home
2 under the influence of p
3 shagging their team members to the point where one had to seek counselling
4 a ccm and a team leader observed shagging each in 6th floor meeting room the male actually took a photo of the act and showed to other UI on floor and nothing was done
5 staff stoned
6 in all people have to be consistent in their discipline for like offences with yesterdays incident which was factually incorrect in the most part It was addressed in a performance feed back session a work mate who was penalised for same thing it was a disciplinary letter makes you think doesn’t it
7 and I will involved the unions lawyers so all gets addressed
8 you might have guessed I through playing games
Add to file please
Cheers paul
No comments:
Post a Comment