as promised

As promised , documents supplied via the privacy commission to me.

Individuals are able to request at any time via the commission any and all documents that pertain to them held by their employer.
Indeed if you are involved in a disciplinary matter , this should be acted on promptly.
... http://privacy.org.nz/contact-us/
.
Email 14 April 2009 Bridgette Dalzell to me
It is your personal opinion only that this meeting is a prelude to an ambush Paul .I hold Michelle and Shaun’s ethics in high regard and I am fully confident that the correct process has be followed so far


Let’s work this through
.
Inquires via the privacy commission, indicated that complaint letters , that were refereed to constantly in numerous disciplinary meetings could not be produced, in fact they never existed.
Minutes of these meetings were signed off as a true and correct record by Shaun Hoult , Team Leader, and Michelle Young.
Committing common law fraud, the nine elements of fraud are
1 a representation of an existing fact
2 its materiality
3 its falsity
4 the speakers knowledge of it falsity
5 the speakers intent that it shall be acted on by the plaintiff (that’s me )
6 the plaintiffs ignorance of its falsity
7 plaintiff reliance on the truth of the representation
8 the plaintiffs right to rely on it and
9 consequent damages suffered by the plaintiff
“Fraud is commonly understood to be dishonesty calculated for advantage i.e. a false representation of a matter of fact whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations or by concealment of what should have been disclosed –that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act on it to his legal injury”
Questions that this raises.
The misrepresentation of the existence of the complaint letter is an act of fraud

Falsely attesting to its existence in minutes as true and correct is an act of fraud
It is also an act of defamation.
Does this indicate to you the reader , that the correct processes have been followed.
Does this indicate to you the reader, that the ethics of those involved should be held in high regard.
Has telecoms code of ethics been breached
has telecoms code of conduct been breached

Has telecoms reputation been brought into disrepute
All staff are required to be aware of and comply with telecoms guidelines that are available on the Internet.
whom is now required to act on the knowledge of this, to ensure that the code of ethics has its integrity maintained.
Does lack of action indicate that the code of ethics and conduct are a "sham"
Why has Bridgette Dalzell .Iain Galloway and Hannah Sullivan who where all invested in the process and allowed fraud to be perpetrated not acted to protect their employers reputation
Why after admitting to fraud and the fact that documents did not in fact exist, did they not stop their actions, apologise and resolve all issues
Why indeed after such object failure do they remain in employment
Why am I pursuing this simple I treated my employer with honesty integrity and transparency i expect it to be reciprocated
Why am I still angry about this, I don’t like being bullied, I don’t like being lied to. the fraud was a lie . and when you tell me I was condescending patronising and rude to an intellectually handicap girl when I have children with in my family group who have that disability you fucking piss me off big time.

Is it not astounding what can be extracted from two short sentences..
Are you looking forward to the next instalment



Be very aware  some if not all of the names below are the subject of a still open complaint for fraud with the Hamilton police

Bridgette Dalzell :current head of outsourced customer care at telecom New Zealand whom is Michelle Young's direct report at time of incident



Michelle Young :call centre manager Hamilton call centre, whom is Shaun Hoults direct report at time of incidents



Shaun Hoult: team manager weekend team Sat-Tues Hamilton



Iain Galloway HR representative for in Hamilton



Hannah Sullivan HR representative head office