defamation threat

Simpson
Grierson
16 July 2010 Partner Reference
J Rooney - Auckland
Paul Evans-McLeod Direct Dial: +64-9-977 5070
17 Minnie Place Fax: +64-9-977 5083
Pu kete E-mail: john .rooney@simpsongrierson .com
HAMILTON 3200


Telecom New Zealand Limited - Privacy Act request

1. Further to our letter of 4 June 2010, we enclose all of your personal information held by Telecom in accordance with the Privacy Act 1993.

yes a xerox box full packed tightly with paper think just take the reams out take the paper off and put it back the person that filled and vetted this box must have been the office junior

2. Telecom has become increasingly concerned by the nature of the allegations made about Telecom employees on your blog. This includes the defamatory statements made about Bridget Dalzell, posted on Saturday 3 July 2010. Telecom requires you to immediately cease any further defamatory comments about its staff and asks that you respect their privacy.

they are not allegtions i am just exposing the lies if it ends up in court good i can ask questions but this time when i asked questions and they lie to me it carries a penalty jail time cause its perjury
most of the time they didnt even bother in thier sheer argrogance to obey thier own process or rules




i have offered john a chance of rebuttal on this one yet to get reply

increasely concerned yeap they should be and they will be

funny that telecom requires that i immediately cease well i required that i be treated with honesty and integrity never got it did i

respect thier privacy did they respect any thing i asked for no way

3. If you have any questions about the contents of this letter or your personal information, please direct those enquiries to us in the first instance.


yeap i will have heaps of questions but what the bet they will stop answering my queries

nice little earner for john thought you think

here is the letter i sent to john to clear up his perception that i made allegations

i think i,m being fair dont you i just posing questions and awaitng answers

if i made a mistake then i will apologise onn this blog ms dalzell is free to add her own commnets if she wishes

but just answer the question posed



Dear John

The truth will set me free

Telecom impugned my good name,

The blog stops when the truth is revealed

Pursuant to the truth

Can ms Dalzell provide me with the answers to the following salient point

No discussion took place where I verbally advised her that Mr. Dick was acting for me

I can independently support my statements she thus far cannot apart from her assertions

I have only had two discussions with ms Dalziel one occurred post a meeting with regard to the outsourcing of our Jobs to Manila .the other at her request and attended by Iain Galloway for telecom hr just prior to the disciplinary action

Ms Dalzeil .if as she advises, had additional meetings, discussions with me then these should be able to be verified ,via times, dates, meeting notes diary notes, phone logs ,access logs to the Hamilton site, travel arrangements etc (her office is not in Hamilton ) I require copies of the actual logs etc

Please also explain why you ,where not, as telecoms counsel, involved in correspondence with myself at a much much earlier date thus the words belie the actions that should have followed on receipt of knowledge that I had engaged a lawyer

can you advise me when I can expect a reply to concerns raised in email sent Mon 12/07/2010 12:31 p.m.

I WILL LEAVE YOU ALL TO DRAW YOUR OWN CONCLUSIONS