recieved a minute from the authority VERY GOOD NEWS

File Number 5315212




IN THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY

AUCKLAND

BETWEEN PAUL EVANS-MCLE0j)

Applicant



AND TELECOM NEW ZEALAND

LIMITED

Respondent

Member of Authority: K J Anderson

Date: 11 March2011







MINUTE OF THE AUThORITY





The Authority is now in possession of a considerable amount of material relating to the claims of Mr Evans-McLeod, as set out in his Statement of Problem received by the Authority on 10th August 2010.



Via an email dated13th September 2010. I recorded that as Mr Evans-McLeod was awaiting information from the office of the Privacy Commissioner, the investigation of the Authority was suspended until the situation became clearer. On 9th January 2011, Mr Evans-McLeod requested that the Authority ~"reopen” the file and he forwarded further material for consideration. This was forwarded to Mr Rooney, acting for the respondent, and he responded on 28th January 2011.



As has been discussed previously, given the history of this dispute, there remains a jurisdictional issue as to whether Mr Evans~McLeod is able to pursue his claims in the Authority. I conclude that the matter of whether or not the Authority has jurisdiction, pertaining Mr Evans-McLeod’s claims, must be treated as a preliminary issue for determination before those claims can be investigated further.



It is my intention to determine the issue of jurisdiction on the papers currently before the Authority. While it is my preliminary conclusion that no further material or submissions are required, if the parties take issue with that view, any summary of argument, regardingthe jurisdictional issue only, must be filed simultaneously, with the Authority, by 31 March 2011.









K J Anderson

Member of the Employment Relations Authority


So what does ALL this mean







It means they are required to look into the circumstances around my dismissal



The information i sent to them and that they are referring to is on my blog its the 35 page submission with 34 attachments



The essential element is the jurisdiction issues

When they forced me to resign i signed away all my rights, the matter was finished with ,signed sealed delivered and telecom thought that was the end of it


But as you know i found out they acted dishonestly by intimating that they had a letter of complaint from  a handicapped girl that said i was "condescending and rude'
it didnt exist there was no letter  it was a fraud and deception

MOST IMPORTANTLY IT IS ILLEGAL

So what this letter is saying is the ERA is now required to investigate in law whether that act of dishonestly and others i highlighted negates/nullifies the original settlements i signed



My information from my learned lawyer friend says it does

So telecom now has to present their argument as to why it should  not  by the 31th of match
If it comes back in my favour its a whole new ball game
 THE IMPORTANT POINT IS THAT THEY RECOGNISE THE VALIDITY OF MY ARGUEMENT AND THE REGONISE THEY HAVE TO MAKE A RULING .IT IS UP TO TELECOM AT NO COST TO ME (OH BUGGER) TO PERSUADE THE AUTHORITY  THAT DISHONESTY IN THE DISCIPLINARY PROCESS  IS ALLOWABLE AND ACCEPTABLE 


I DONT THINK SO 




IF I AM FORTUNATE ENOUGH TO HAVE A RULING IN MY FAVOUR  THERE IS GOING TO BE A HUGE UPROAR AS ALL OTHER DISCIPLINARY PROCESS PERPERTRATED BY ALL THE PEOPLE INVOLVED IN MY DISMISSAL WILL HAVE TO BE RE -EVALUATED WITH A FINE TOOTH COMB TO ENSURE THAT JUSTICE WAS NOT ONLY ,DONE BUT IT WAS SEEN TO BE DONE   


PLUS CONSIDERATION WILL HAVE TO BE GIVEN AS TO WHETHER A CRIME WAS COMMITTED SUCH AS FRAUD OR DECEPTION UNDER THE CRIMES ACT

CONSIDERATION MAY HAVE TO BE GIVEN AS WHO WAS CUPABLE UNDER SAME ACT

ALL PARTIES BROUGHT IT ON THEMSELVES  THEY WHERE THE ONES WHO ACTED ILLEAGALLY I NOT COUNTING MY CHICKENS BEFORE THEY HAVE HATCHED

 HOWEVER IT WILL BE INTERESTING  PRECEDENT IN LAW IF THEY GET AWAY WITH ACTING DISHONESTLY

SOME COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN RECIEVED


Good luck mate. I hope the ruling goes in your favour and that there is some rethinking on how the whole HR community think they can bully people into submission.



Wow.
The fight is still on then.
Good one Paul.


You go Paul

Good luck pal, I've got my nuts crossed for ya.

when your famous for bringing down telecom can i still be  your friend

 

Yay!!! Paul! That is awesome news mate!




Current Telecom participants




Bridgette Dalzell :current head of outsourced customer care at telecom New Zealand whom is Michelle Young's direct report at time of incident



Michelle Young :call centre manager Hamilton call centre, whom is Shaun Hoults direct report at time of incidents



Shaun Hoult: team manager weekend team Sat-Tues Hamilton



Iain Galloway HR representative for in Hamilton



Hannah Sullivan HR representative head office