its complicated

Telecom conundrum is complicated




They in reality have three options



A tell the truth ,



B lie



C fudge the answer with a  legal phrase something like “Telecom has said to the extent which these documents exist ’blah blah which in reality means you got me but be fucked if I’m going to admit it



All three will lead to my redemption



The third has a penalty, it may well lead telecoms participants to jail because my only remedy will be to pursue the matter to the courts and let them perjure themselves

They will not only lose their jobs but also their freedom they haven’t worked out the question yet we will let it slowly unfold as always in the goodness of time the results will be published I have kept a lot back as the timing is not right



I feel a bit like wiki leaks except I haven’t got half a million pages but I firmly believe I have sufficient

telecom has got itself a conundrum

Conundrum is a logical postulation that evades resolution, an intricate and difficult problem


the solution will show everybody the true character of the company and some individuals with in it
you will be either enlightened or disgusted as the pieces finally fall into place and dishonesty and duplicity is revealed
 
who will be the sacrifical lamb or will they cull the flock all questions will be answered in the fullness of time

I make no personal claim to the truth, only the right to seek it

I make no personal claim to the truth, only the right to seek it, prove it in argument, and to be wrong many times in order to reach it."

have spent the afternoon talking to both police and lawyers regarding the possibilites of laying criminal or civil charges against my former mangermnet team 

both are intrigued by my approach just need co-relate some more information .possibl;iy get some affadits signed and decide which would be the most advantageous avenue to approach the problem with

cant at this stage say a lot more except to say that it is lossely based around unthruths.deception and some documents that on close inspection are false 

yes i,m micromanging them the law requires they get it 100% right they didnt 

have paid overnight my costs to telecom. wonder if the will send me a reciept  so that bit of fun is finished with not overly worried as will regain money spent thru another avenue
must say im disappionted that they havent worked out what is the real intent behind all my actions i honestly thought they may have had an inkling by now oh well

Current Telecom participants




Bridgette Dalzell :current head of outsourced customer care at telecom New Zealand whom is Michelle Young's direct report at time of incident



Michelle Young :call centre manager Hamilton call centre, whom is Shaun Hoults direct report at time of incidents



Shaun Hoult: team manager weekend team Sat-Tues Hamilton



Iain Galloway HR representative for in Hamilton



Hannah Sullivan HR representative head office

some people would do well to remember it

"Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth." ~ Mahatma Gandhi

have recieved reponse from privacy commsioner

oh dear they keep digging themselves a hole they have compounded thier case yet again

note from letter

— Telecom has advised that as far as it was aware details of  *********  were contained in emails which were included in the documents which were provided to you.


well i suspect telecom is represented in this case by thier instruction agent iain galloway  iain is not doing his job properly or not asking the right questons of the right people and those people are not maybe  being completely honest with iain i have asked for specfic documents they have yet to be produced  can you guess why


below is my partial response

THEY NEED TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE  AS BOTH SHAUN HOULT  AND HIS MANAGER MICHELLE YOUNG WHERE COMPLICT IN THIS ACTION THEY ARE NOT ONLY LYING TO ME THEY ARE LYING TO YOU AND THE OFFICE OF THE  PRIVACY COMMSIONER THAT IS SIMPLY NOT ON AND SHOULD NOT AND CANNOT BE TOLERATED AS IT DIMINISES BOTH THE PROCESS AND THE AUTHORITY

am i concerned about printing thier names am i worried about a defamation case am i worried about them threaten me NO
because this idiots have lied to me and then they signed the lie off by saying that yes these are a true and correct record of what took place wankers

if you check back in my notes you will see the tried to get me for defamation of Bridgit Dalzell  until i wrote back alerting them to a couple of facts in writing and said see you in court perhaps it was the comment made in the same letter that lying in court is perjury and comes with a jail sentence that made them back off

note to shaun and michelle dont employ intelligent people and then treat them like idiots
and shunt them out after 39,1/4  years of service and blacken thier name and blacklist them  tends to piss them off

 another note you idiots you failed to appreciate the drive that drove me to achieve top salesperson three years in a row would still exist in me but now im applying it to right a serious wrong nope not giving up 

instructing the privacy commsioner to present the evidence direct to the board as i strongly suspect that the information flow is being managed by HR 
then they will have 10 days to respond before i publish it


 THESE PEOPLES ACTIONS HAVE BROUGHT THE COMPANY INTO DISREPUTE THEIR ARSES WILL BE OUT THE DOOR BEFORE THIER FEET HIT THE GROUND


told you it would unfold over the summer then i will present it to the next group the human rights commssion or perhaps the privacy commision will be so incensed they are being played for fools they may do it them selves that would be lovely as it would be at any cost to me


oh they are not worried about it  at all thought perhaps they could provide an answer as to why my stats for the site rockerted up to the sky at precisely 3 pm to day
me thinks they got a letter as well