Friday, September 28, 2012
Friday, September 21, 2012
do we tick all the boxes
A great equation for corruption is
Corruption = Monopoly + Discretion – Accountability
do we tick all the boxes yeap i think we do
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
over it
There are laws that have been broken in this saga, the trick is get someone to act ,have set in place various plans to achieve same
Have an appointment at my mps office on Monday to set in motion a plan to get the question raised on the floor of the house
When I know it happening will inform my media contacts
Telecom knows about the fraud but has so refused to act ,so i am over it ,they can answer to the media and be judged in the court of public opinion
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
the ceo is aware of the matter we await the response
John
He is aware of the matter, I am confused therefore, why, he hasn’t, as required by telecom’s code of ethics (supported and backed by his board) acted on the breech by staff of their ethical and legal obligations
The wrong is required to be put right
The five participants committed fraud (by your own admission the relevant document does not exist)
I wish them to be held to account for their illegal act
Warm regards
Paul
From: John Rooney [mailto:John.Rooney@simpsongrierson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2012 11:56 a.m.
To: 'Paul Mcleod'
Subject: RE: confirmation [SG-SGDMS.FID361431]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2012 11:56 a.m.
To: 'Paul Mcleod'
Subject: RE: confirmation [SG-SGDMS.FID361431]
Dear Paul,
We refer to your emails of 6 September, the contents of which are noted. The new CEO is aware of this matter.
We have been asked to remind you that all correspondence and communications are to be directed to us.
Regards
John Rooney
Partner
Simpson Grierson
Level 27, 88 Shortland Street, Private Bag 92518, Auckland, New Zealand
DDI +64-9-977 5070 | Fax +64-9-977 5083 | Mobile +64-21 499 365john.rooney@simpsongrierson.com | www.simpsongrierson.com
John Rooney
Partner
Simpson Grierson
Level 27, 88 Shortland Street, Private Bag 92518, Auckland, New Zealand
DDI +64-9-977 5070 | Fax +64-9-977 5083 | Mobile +64-21 499 365john.rooney@simpsongrierson.com | www.simpsongrierson.com
From: Paul Mcleod [mailto:paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Thursday, 6 September 2012 5:57 p.m.
To: John Rooney
Subject: confirmation
Sent: Thursday, 6 September 2012 5:57 p.m.
To: John Rooney
Subject: confirmation
John
On review, the previous letter require more clarity
Question being asked by those taking an intense interest in this case is
Is the new Ceo aware of this, its implications, and a chance to respond
Hence my need for confirmation
warm regards
Paul
17 Minnie Place
Pukete
Te Rapa
Hamilton
New Zealand
Phone 0064 7 8494584
Mobile 0272423222
Wednesday, September 5, 2012
letter sent to domion post among others
letter sent to domion post among others
Hi
Remember this
http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/3415928/I-was-bullied-says-call-centre-staffer
...
Hi
Remember this
http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/3415928/I-was-bullied-says-call-centre-staffer
...
Well if I were bullied unfortunately you where conned by telecom and thier media pr machine
After nearly four decades of service to a major corporate Telecom I found myself micro-managed out of a job and constructively dismissed, subsequent enquires elicited the fact that fraud formed part of management’s case
Holding them to account as indeed prove a trail which has amazed and amuzed me
The lengths a corporate goes in terms of perpetuating the fraud by legal means and the cost of that ,The principles of law inherent in the case and the corporate thumbing their nose at legal requirements The corporate approach to mediation process and their HR’s manipulation of it.
The impact on employment law should disciplinary actions be required to be verified as truthful and accurate and able to proven and presented as such (should cost prevent justice, and truth)
The validity of stated corporate ethics, their proponent’s responsibilities and adherence to the stated beliefs and values
The corporate morality exposed by the condoning of swingers sex on work time and work premises, (as no action taken) verses please produce the letter (a simple request ) , and involve lawyers , HR to deny and confound The time and money spend on ignoring my requests against a simple act of requesting the letter be presented
Where does the power really rest with the law, with the government or with the corporate and where does the impact the average person in the street,The responses of government agencies to the problem, deemed too hard and the disingenuous response bureaucratic ping pong into a catch 22 situation
What does the demonstrated values of both the corporate and the government in this case say about their real concern for either their public, their staff or their citizens (by their own words you shall know them) Whom displays the integrity the individual going slowly through the prescribed process, to have his intelligence insulted with patronising responses.
The essence of the case is simple request the letter, produce the letter ,,,,all that it is based on after that is a lie. Whom is really accountable within corporate....is there a deliberate strategy to blur the actions and paths to appropriate resolution
Whom is really accountable within government and their agencies Whom determines when a law is broken and evidence produced whether that is pursued , is the law the law or those tasked with its enforcement be that government agencies or the police able to determine their jurisprudence which is really the place of the courts
It follows that if those who want to stop or impede the abuse of power (or those who are charged with this duty) do not have sufficient power (even if it were only moral power), they and their efforts will only serve as a source of amusement to those who abuse it. However with the judicious use of the internet it will be found that sin indeed casts a long shadow ,does the ceo know there are bad apples contaminating the barrel
The crux of the case, disciplinary proceedings were commenced on the basis of a written letter customer compliant which was not produced when asked for and was acknowledged subsequently by Telecoms lawyer from Simpson Grierson as not existing
at all. Hence it is a fraud, knowingly acted on by all within Telecom, that impacted on my legal and human rights..
A complaint to the police has be laid and assigned a number which validates my allegations
The above attachments proves my bona fides
Simon moutter is the new CEO I strongly suggest you deal directly with him least you get managed again ring 0800801080
The participants in this debacle are
Bridgette Dalzell :current head of outsourced customer care at telecom New Zealand whom is Michelle Young's direct report at time of incident
Michelle Young :call centre manager Hamilton call centre, whom is Shaun Hoults direct report at time of incidents
Shaun Hoult: team manager weekend team Sat-Tues Hamilton
Iain Galloway HR representative for in Hamilton
Hannah Sullivan HR representative head office
perhaps you could contact them directly
After nearly four decades of service to a major corporate Telecom I found myself micro-managed out of a job and constructively dismissed, subsequent enquires elicited the fact that fraud formed part of management’s case
Holding them to account as indeed prove a trail which has amazed and amuzed me
The lengths a corporate goes in terms of perpetuating the fraud by legal means and the cost of that ,The principles of law inherent in the case and the corporate thumbing their nose at legal requirements The corporate approach to mediation process and their HR’s manipulation of it.
The impact on employment law should disciplinary actions be required to be verified as truthful and accurate and able to proven and presented as such (should cost prevent justice, and truth)
The validity of stated corporate ethics, their proponent’s responsibilities and adherence to the stated beliefs and values
The corporate morality exposed by the condoning of swingers sex on work time and work premises, (as no action taken) verses please produce the letter (a simple request ) , and involve lawyers , HR to deny and confound The time and money spend on ignoring my requests against a simple act of requesting the letter be presented
Where does the power really rest with the law, with the government or with the corporate and where does the impact the average person in the street,The responses of government agencies to the problem, deemed too hard and the disingenuous response bureaucratic ping pong into a catch 22 situation
What does the demonstrated values of both the corporate and the government in this case say about their real concern for either their public, their staff or their citizens (by their own words you shall know them) Whom displays the integrity the individual going slowly through the prescribed process, to have his intelligence insulted with patronising responses.
The essence of the case is simple request the letter, produce the letter ,,,,all that it is based on after that is a lie. Whom is really accountable within corporate....is there a deliberate strategy to blur the actions and paths to appropriate resolution
Whom is really accountable within government and their agencies Whom determines when a law is broken and evidence produced whether that is pursued , is the law the law or those tasked with its enforcement be that government agencies or the police able to determine their jurisprudence which is really the place of the courts
It follows that if those who want to stop or impede the abuse of power (or those who are charged with this duty) do not have sufficient power (even if it were only moral power), they and their efforts will only serve as a source of amusement to those who abuse it. However with the judicious use of the internet it will be found that sin indeed casts a long shadow ,does the ceo know there are bad apples contaminating the barrel
The crux of the case, disciplinary proceedings were commenced on the basis of a written letter customer compliant which was not produced when asked for and was acknowledged subsequently by Telecoms lawyer from Simpson Grierson as not existing
at all. Hence it is a fraud, knowingly acted on by all within Telecom, that impacted on my legal and human rights..
A complaint to the police has be laid and assigned a number which validates my allegations
The above attachments proves my bona fides
Simon moutter is the new CEO I strongly suggest you deal directly with him least you get managed again ring 0800801080
The participants in this debacle are
Bridgette Dalzell :current head of outsourced customer care at telecom New Zealand whom is Michelle Young's direct report at time of incident
Michelle Young :call centre manager Hamilton call centre, whom is Shaun Hoults direct report at time of incidents
Shaun Hoult: team manager weekend team Sat-Tues Hamilton
Iain Galloway HR representative for in Hamilton
Hannah Sullivan HR representative head office
perhaps you could contact them directly
been a fun day
been a fun day
Over it Frans
But thank you for the courtesy of replying
Have advised the news paper contact to publish and be dammed have contacted all major dallies
I am now pursing the share holder register expect pointed questions at the next agm
I fear three newspapers more than a hundred thousand bayonets.”
-Napoleon Bonaparte
A dictator like Napoleon Bonaparte would have every reason to fear a free press, because it arms citizens with essential information-the truth,
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. ...Arthur Schopenhauer
Consider why I would correspond with a lawyer who by his own admission in writing has admitted the letter concerned does not exist
And his monotonous response is” we will not enter into any further correspondence” this over a clear case of fraud
This insults my intelligence I am well aware the strategy of the corporate is to continuously send stuff round and round until you get pissed off enough to stop, hence everything is via John Ronney whom handles all correspondence and basically replies with a FO letter.
“We have been advised by our client of your recent contact with Simon Mouter's office. We have therefore been instructed to once again remind you that all communications, enquiries etc are to be made through us. Direct approaches to Telecom and any of its employees and officers will not be responded to.””
Unfortunately this response to an editor will only heighten his resolve to get to the truth
Why should I have trust in my management structure when over time I have written evidence of their lies signed off a true and correct record?
John Rooney threatened me with defamation re Bridgette Dalzell my response bring it on and showed him just a nibble of what I had; he had the good sense to back off
Have you actually forwarded my attachments to Simon Moutter for comment I strongly suggest you do, as it is his brand and telecoms image that are going to be impacted and he is going be very embarrassed by the actions of some of his staff so early in his tenure
I have offered telecom a olive branch and it has be spurned, Telecom insult me with patronising responses. Fortunately I now have four large folders of them
With no assets to my name all I have left is the power of the press
Warm regards
Paul
From: Frans van Zoggel [mailto:Frans.vanZoggel@telecom.co.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, 5 September 2012 11:09 a.m.
To: 'Paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz'
Subject: Paul Evans-McLeod re: your voicemail
Mr Evans-McLeod,
Thank you for your voicemail.
To answer your queries:
• Yes, I have forwarded your concerns to the appropriate people.
• Yes, Simon Moutter is aware of your contact ( you spoke with his Executive Assistant on Monday)
• You did say you would forward the Police complaint, but this hasn't been received as yet, please forward this directly to John Rooney.
Moving forward, any contact you wish to make in respects of these matters MUST be referred to Telecom's Solicitor, John Rooney ONLY.
Regards
Frans van Zoggel
Customer Champion
Operational Regulatory Group - Telecom Retail
T
M
E 03 353 5085 (0800 10 80 10 extn 32085)
027 2800 922
Over it Frans
But thank you for the courtesy of replying
Have advised the news paper contact to publish and be dammed have contacted all major dallies
I am now pursing the share holder register expect pointed questions at the next agm
I fear three newspapers more than a hundred thousand bayonets.”
-Napoleon Bonaparte
A dictator like Napoleon Bonaparte would have every reason to fear a free press, because it arms citizens with essential information-the truth,
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. ...Arthur Schopenhauer
Consider why I would correspond with a lawyer who by his own admission in writing has admitted the letter concerned does not exist
And his monotonous response is” we will not enter into any further correspondence” this over a clear case of fraud
This insults my intelligence I am well aware the strategy of the corporate is to continuously send stuff round and round until you get pissed off enough to stop, hence everything is via John Ronney whom handles all correspondence and basically replies with a FO letter.
“We have been advised by our client of your recent contact with Simon Mouter's office. We have therefore been instructed to once again remind you that all communications, enquiries etc are to be made through us. Direct approaches to Telecom and any of its employees and officers will not be responded to.””
Unfortunately this response to an editor will only heighten his resolve to get to the truth
Why should I have trust in my management structure when over time I have written evidence of their lies signed off a true and correct record?
John Rooney threatened me with defamation re Bridgette Dalzell my response bring it on and showed him just a nibble of what I had; he had the good sense to back off
Have you actually forwarded my attachments to Simon Moutter for comment I strongly suggest you do, as it is his brand and telecoms image that are going to be impacted and he is going be very embarrassed by the actions of some of his staff so early in his tenure
I have offered telecom a olive branch and it has be spurned, Telecom insult me with patronising responses. Fortunately I now have four large folders of them
With no assets to my name all I have left is the power of the press
Warm regards
Paul
From: Frans van Zoggel [mailto:Frans.vanZoggel@telecom.co.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, 5 September 2012 11:09 a.m.
To: 'Paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz'
Subject: Paul Evans-McLeod re: your voicemail
Mr Evans-McLeod,
Thank you for your voicemail.
To answer your queries:
• Yes, I have forwarded your concerns to the appropriate people.
• Yes, Simon Moutter is aware of your contact ( you spoke with his Executive Assistant on Monday)
• You did say you would forward the Police complaint, but this hasn't been received as yet, please forward this directly to John Rooney.
Moving forward, any contact you wish to make in respects of these matters MUST be referred to Telecom's Solicitor, John Rooney ONLY.
Regards
Frans van Zoggel
Customer Champion
Operational Regulatory Group - Telecom Retail
T
M
E 03 353 5085 (0800 10 80 10 extn 32085)
027 2800 922
Tuesday, September 4, 2012
nope they still havent worked it out yet
So there you have it Chris
We have a clear case of fraud admitted to in written correspondence which they refuse to acknowledge or respond to as required by their own code of ethics and possibliy by law
This correspondence is in direct response to me ringing Simon Mouters office to have a direct conversation with HIM regarding fraud within his own company
I suspect the client is actually a HR wonk covering his back side perhaps Simon Mouter is unaware of what is being with held
Perhaps your papers lawyers may want to deal with him directly
SO PUBLISH AND BE DAMED I SAY OR WE WILL WAIT FOR THE QUESTION IN THE HOUSE YOUR CALL FILL YOUR BOOTS IAM ALSO CONSIDERING STARTING A PETITON
From: John Rooney [mailto:John.Rooney@simpsongrierson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 4 September 2012 4:10 p.m.
To: 'Paul Mcleod'
Subject: RE: my story [SG-SGDMS.FID361431]
Sent: Tuesday, 4 September 2012 4:10 p.m.
To: 'Paul Mcleod'
Subject: RE: my story [SG-SGDMS.FID361431]
Dear Paul,
We have been advised by our client of your recent contact with Simon Mouter's office. We have therefore been instructed to once again remind you that all communications, enquiries etc are to be made through us. Direct approaches to Telecom and any of its employees and officers will not be responded to.
Regards
John Rooney
Partner
Simpson Grierson
Level 27, 88 Shortland Street, Private Bag 92518, Auckland, New Zealand
DDI +64-9-977 5070 | Fax +64-9-977 5083 | Mobile +64-21 499 365john.rooney@simpsongrierson.com | www.simpsongrierson.com
John Rooney
Partner
Simpson Grierson
Level 27, 88 Shortland Street, Private Bag 92518, Auckland, New Zealand
DDI +64-9-977 5070 | Fax +64-9-977 5083 | Mobile +64-21 499 365john.rooney@simpsongrierson.com | www.simpsongrierson.com
From: Paul Mcleod [mailto:paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012 11:14 p.m.
To: 'Chris Gardner (Waikato Times)'
Cc: John Rooney
Subject: RE: my story
Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012 11:14 p.m.
To: 'Chris Gardner (Waikato Times)'
Cc: John Rooney
Subject: RE: my story
Hi chris
The fraud is not alleged it is proven admitted by telecoms own lawyer
Short story
After 39 years 3 months I was micromanaged out of my job
Among the misdemeanours I was disciplined for was a complaint by a 15 year old IHC girl I had dealt with who had supposedly written to telecom herself to complain that in dealing with her that I was “condescending patronising and rude “this was written in meeting notes signed of by my team leader and my site manager as a true and correct record
After being constructively dismissed I decided that things needed a bit more research I realised that without denigrating her disability a 15 IHC girl couldn’t understand the concept of
Condescending patronising and rude let alone convey it to any other adult
so I asked for all notes on me via principle e seven of the privacy act
this letter from the above 15 ihc girl was not in the notes so I asked again and again specifically for the letter ,eventually their layer john Rooney of Simpson grieson. admitted under
Any additional information is therefore withheld under section 29(2)(b) on the basis that it does not exist.
Please read attachment letter is send to the head of the cib
So telecom used fraud to get me into a disciplinary matter
Once discovered and acknowledged I asked
Does the fraud discovered and acknowledged nullffily all that occurred from that document so re instate me
is fraud allowed in a disciplinary proceeded
Seriously email John.Rooney@simon grieson.com
indicated you are a reporter indicate you are enquiring about a case of fraud with relevant to my case tell him I given permission for you to have the letter he wont be able to produce it
because in his own writing therefore withheld under section 29(2)(b) on the basis that it does not exist.
Tell him you awriting a major expose
So I have a police complaint.so the police concur and validate my concern that it is a crime but nobody wants to deal with it
Cheers paul
From: Chris Gardner (Waikato Times) [mailto:Chris.Gardner@WaikatoTimes.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012 4:55 p.m.
To: 'Paul Mcleod'
Subject: RE: my story
Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012 4:55 p.m.
To: 'Paul Mcleod'
Subject: RE: my story
Hi Paul
Ok, thanks.
So what's the fraud you're alleging?
Perhaps talk to Sue and ask her to ring me when you do.
Regards
Chris Gardner
Technology Editor
(Also covering the energy sector and Waitomo and Otorohanga districts in the King Country)
Waikato Times
Physical Address: 70 Foreman Road, Te Rapa, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
Postal Address: Private Bag 3086, Hamilton, New Zealand
Phone: +64 7 849 9612
Cell phone: +64 27 231 7007
Fax: +64 7 849 9603
Website: www.waikatotimes.co.nz
Twitter: @iTimesEditor
Join us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
A member of the Fairfax Media group and a division of Fairfax New Zealand limited.
From: Paul Mcleod [mailto:paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012 4:47 p.m.
To: Chris Gardner (Waikato Times)
Subject: RE: my story
Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012 4:47 p.m.
To: Chris Gardner (Waikato Times)
Subject: RE: my story
Hi Chris
Currently no action at all, the minister rather than instructing her people to deal with it ,just sends it to the commissioner, the commissioner can’t be bothered ,send sit back to the head of Hamilton district he can’t be bothered either
So nobody is acting on it
Monday I am ringing Sue moroney mp for another appointment to find out her next step is ,you may want to incorporate her views into an article .it may well be her next step is a question in the house I am happy for you to talk to her about my issue
The angle this time is not that I was bullied that was the angle last time, but the fact I found them, out committing fraud ,they have acknowledged the letter of complaint never did exist
I have a police complaint .so the police concur and validate my concern that it is a crime but nobody wants to deal with it
Even an article embarrassing them about it would help
Simon Mounter becomes the new ceo as of this month he may not want this sort of crap on his desk
Cheer Paul
From: Chris Gardner (Waikato Times) [mailto:Chris.Gardner@WaikatoTimes.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012 2:22 p.m.
To: 'Paul Mcleod'
Subject: RE: my story
Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012 2:22 p.m.
To: 'Paul Mcleod'
Subject: RE: my story
Hi
Still trying to ascertain the fresh angle.
What's the latest on it?
Regards
Chris Gardner
Technology Editor
(Also covering the energy sector and Waitomo and Otorohanga districts in the King Country)
Waikato Times
Physical Address: 70 Foreman Road, Te Rapa, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
Postal Address: Private Bag 3086, Hamilton, New Zealand
Phone: +64 7 849 9612
Cell phone: +64 27 231 7007
Fax: +64 7 849 9603
Website: www.waikatotimes.co.nz
Twitter: @iTimesEditor
Join us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
A member of the Fairfax Media group and a division of Fairfax New Zealand limited.
From: Paul Mcleod [mailto:paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Saturday, 1 September 2012 11:37 a.m.
To: Chris Gardner (Waikato Times)
Subject: my story
Sent: Saturday, 1 September 2012 11:37 a.m.
To: Chris Gardner (Waikato Times)
Subject: my story
Hi
Chris I was unsuccessful in my job application so feel free to go ahead with my story whenever you feel like it
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)