Petitioning the House of Representatives.

On next years agenda the house sits in early february

a lot of people will not like their names mentioned on the floor of parliament

Petitioning the House of Representatives.
Anyone may petition the House of Representatives to ask it to act on a matter of public policy or law, or to set right a local or private issue. There are rules about what comprises an acceptable petition. The rules are outlined in Petitioning the House of Representatives.
What is a petition?
A petition is a document addressed to the House of Representatives and signed by at least one person. It asks the House to act on a matter of public policy or law, or to put right a local or private concern. Anyone of any age can petition the House including corporations and unincorporated bodies with sufficient identity as organisations.

What is a petition? A signed request for the House to take action A petition is a document addressed exclusively to the House of Representatives, signed by one person or many people, requesting the House to take a clearly defined action on a matter of public policy or law, or to redress a local or private grievance. Who can petition? Any person can sign a petition Anyone of any age may petition the House of Representatives, including corporations and unincorporated bodies having sufficient identity as organisations.

Should you petition? You may petition the House when other remedies have been exhausted Petitioning the House should be your last course of action. You may petition the House when no other remedies are available, or where other statutory remedies have been exhausted.

so what happens next  well people will be called in front of a select committee to explain themselves
i will be ensuring the media attend
at its most basic level fraud has been committed to my detriment telecom CEO and board have failed to have it addressed .

THUS THEY HAVE IGNORED THEIR OWN  CODES OF ETHICS AND CODE OF CONDUCT .BY ATTENDING THE SELECT COMMITTEE THE WILL HAVE BROUGHT TELECOM INTO DISREPUTE

turth lies and bullshit you decide

November 2012                                                                         Partner Reference

                                                                                                J Rooney - Auckland

TTim Maclndoe                                                                                         Writers Details

                                                                                                  Direct Dial: +64-9-977 5070

mpP for 1-familton West                                                                     Fax: +64-9-977 5083

Parliament Buildings                                                     Email: johnraoney~simpsongrierson.com

WELLINGTON 1610

                                                                                                                  SENT BY EMAIL

                                                                                         tim.macindoe~parIiamenti~ovtnz

Paul Evans-McLeod

1.    We act for Telecom New Zealand Limited (Telecom) who have passed us your letter addressed to Simon Moutter of 9 October 2012. We have been advising Telecom on this issue since Mr Evans-McLeod raised his first personal grievance. Given the history of events, Telecom requires that all correspondence and dealings on the matter occur through Simpson Grierson. We have therefore been instructed to respond to your letter.

Completely correct however this an attempt to define the rule of engagement so all correspondence can be managed by the lawyer anD hr

2.    The document provided by Mr Evans-McLeod and enclosed with your letter does not provide an accurate outline of the history. Telecom emphatically denies that any of its actions in relation to Mr Evans-McLeod were in any way fraudulent.

Sorry unless telecom is able to produce the  original letter form the handicap girl claiming I was condescending and rude their action where fraudulent more over they knowing went into a mediation with the full knowledge that part of their case was based on a lie this is illegal

Consider this The first request was for a written complaint. As set out in my letter of 12 November 2010, Telecom advised that, in terms of your request for details of two customer complaints which had been made about you, the information was contained in emails which were included in the documents previously provided to you.Any additional information is therefore withheld under section 29(2)(b) on the basis that it does not exist.

3.    Mr Evans-McLeod and Telecom participated in mediation provided by the Department of Labour on 17 August 2009. The applicant was represented by the EPMU. Following mediation, Mr Evans-McLeod resigned and the parties freely entered into a record of settlement which was expressly stated to be in full and final settlement of all matters between Mr Evans-McLeod and Telecom arising out of their employment relationship and its termination. This record was signed by a Department of Labour mediator pursuant to section 149 of the Employment Relations Act 2000.

What I wish clarification on is the commencement of proceeding leading to mediation based on nonexistent documents, so how can that be freely entered into

Indicates deceit, premeditation predetermined outcome, all contrary to the law and the requirement of the legal acts surrounding the era and mediation process  

Fraud is commonly understood to be dishonesty calculated for advantage i.e. a false representation of a matter of fact whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations or by concealment of what should have been disclosed –that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act on it to his legal injury

Represented by the epmu documents supplied by privacy commission show epmu representative was in “without prejudice communication” with national manger Bridgette Dalzell I was played and betrayed by the very people that should have had my best interest at heart

4.    In signing the record of settlement, the mediator explained to Mr Evans-McLeod that the terms of settlement were final and binding on the parties and that, except for enforcement purposes, Mr Evans-McLeod could not seek to bring those terms before the Authority or the Court, whether by action, appeal, application for review, or otherwise.

Not appealing the review etc, requesting the alleged document...pursuant to other legal action.

Other comments, happy to be corrected, can Telecom please indicate which specific areas of fact are in dispute.

5.    Nevertheless, approximately four months later Mr Evans-McLeod purported to raise a personal grievance for unjustifiable dismissaL He subsequently filed proceedings in the Employment Relations Authority claiming he had been unjustifiably dismissed. This claim was unsuccessful and in a determination dated 26 April 2010 the Authority determined that Mr Evans-McLeod was statute barred from pursuing a personal grievance. The Authority found that Mr Evans-McLeod freely entered into the record of settlement. The Authority also found that Mr Evans-MoLeod’s resignation had not resulted from any inappropriate or unlawful action on Telecom’s part or by anyone else.

At this point neither myself or the authority had no knowledge of any inappropriate or unlawful action  however telecom did but where withholding all requests for it as they had full knowledge in didn’t in fact exist

6.           Mr Evans-McLeod subsequently filed a second claim with the employment Relations Authonty in August 2010 seeking compensation for determination loss of incomeiricome of $70 000 per annum for Telecom allegedly deliberately blacklisting his name within the telecommunications industry In a determination  dated 19 Jt~ly 2012 the Authority dismissed the claim for want of jurisdiction In that n the Authority referred to Mr Evans-McLeod pursuing what appears to L~ little short of a vexatious and misguided campaign of litigation against Telecom~

Please explain the request for Hannah sullicna dated Thursday 3 september 2009 12.29 pm

To frenanda schyns of ask HR

Subject paul evans-mcleod

Please mark paulS file as “do not re-employ”

As telecom controls all the communications infrastructure ie the exchange building where the phone numbers origination from this effectively bars me form the full completionsome of work hence I am effectively black listed

7 Mr Evans-McLeod~s document does not contain anything he has not repeatedly raised before and continues to recycle incorrect facts about the circumstances surrounding his resignation from Telecom. Telecom has previously given full consideration to the many claims Mr Evans-McLeod has raised and is satisfied it has acted appropriately.

7 recycled incorrect please advise line by line which facts are incorrect and I will happy refute them line by line this cooment boders on being libelous

8.            In all of the circumstances Telecom does not consider there is anything to be gained by yet further investigation. As far as Telecom is concerned there is no ~dispute”. Mr Evans-McLeod was not constructively dismissed on a fraudulent act as he alleges. He freely resigned and entered into a binding record of settlement.

Rubbish there is a lot to be gained the truth

Produce the letter other wise it is fraud

Fraud is commonly understood to be dishonesty calculated for advantage i.e. a false representation of a matter of fact whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations or by concealment of what should have been disclosed –that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act on it to his legal injury

Yours f~~jHy

SIMP$~’GRIERSON

John Roon~

Partner

back to the DOL

LETS SEE IT THIS GET SOME TRACTION

Betty FYI please add to file thank you

To whom it may concern

Quite frankly I have had enough and I just want someone, somewhere to do their job

I have spend in excess of three years attempting to get this problem sorted ,it has been sent around all the relevant minsters and has finally landed back at your departments desk ( please refer to attachment Kate Wilkinson ) she clearly indicates her ownership  

I have taken advice from just about everybody I can think of, .gone around and around in circles chasing my tail while government departments play game after game of bureaucratic ping- pong

Kate Wilkinson invites me to seek legal advice to seek options available to me,

My consul advise me that under law ,you are required to assist me both under various labour and employment laws has well as article 27 of the human rights act  my right to justice

I want a very senior manager to resolve this complaint with in the prescribe 20 days indicated on your web site

The following links will give you has much resources as you require

Please refer http://www.change.org/en-AU/petitions/right-to-justice

If deeper back ground and material is required

Please refer to http://hwyop.blogspot.co.nz/

Plus pull all the files your department has on this 

The essential element is at dispute is this?

Question: Does fraud enacted in the a disciplinary procedure nullify all proceedings, statements, agreements that flow forward from that fraud ?

I agree totally that I signed of things mediation etc etc based on the knowledge available to me it was the right thing to do

But then I discovered my previous employer had effected fraud in achieving my exit from the company research into my file held at your office will show a letter that shows Kate Wilkinson agreeing it a crime and advising me to take it to the SFO or the police

Well I did, the SFO office wasn't interested , the police looked at my evidence ,agreed it was a crime, allocated a complaint no to it ,which validated everything I have been saying for the  last few years .they now advise that they will not commit any resources to its resolution

Amazing when all that is required is for someone  to ask telecom to produce a document (which they have already admitted doesn’t exist) fraud proven case proven

I have enlisted the generous assistance of National Mp  Tim McIndoe he has communicated directly with the CEO on the 9^th of last month .he has yet to received a reply

I have attempted to use the “whistleblower act “telecom management sent my complaint to their legal team John Rooney of Simpson Grierson.  Absolutely amazing when in fact he is part of the complaint and I believe highly illegal

So please send this where it needs to go and get someone with in your organisation to do their job and achieve for me a successful resolution

No excuses, no passing the buck, your minister says it your problem. Own it and resolve it please !!!!!

Thank you

telecom fucked it up badly this time

telecom fucked it up badly this time so good i decided such stupidy needed media coverage
so i sent this off to the various agencies

"Is this story of interest to you

...

Editor /senior management

I have a major scoop for you

Synopsis

I placed a compliant via telecom whistleblower site

Telecom referred the complaint to the very lawyer that formed part of the complaint

MY REPLY TO THIER LAWYER
Under the Protected Disclosures Act, it appears that Telecom is in breach of section 19 of the act amongst others.


“19 Confidentiality states
• (1) Every person to whom a protected disclosure is made or referred must use his or her best endeavours not to disclose information that might identify the person who made the protected disclosure unless—
o (a) that person consents in writing to the disclosure of that information; or
o (b) the person who has acquired knowledge of the protected disclosure reasonably believes that disclosure of identifying information—
(i) is essential to the effective investigation of the allegations in the protected disclosure; or
(ii) is essential to prevent serious risk to public health or public safety or the environment; or
(iii) is essential having regard to the principles of natural justice

I did not provide for written consent.

I am thus more than a little surprised that, as yourself is mentioned within my submission, that you should have such immediate access...”

translation

i followed the diclosure procedures of the act they didnt and they now in deep deep dogy doo
they where in such a hurry to close me off and shut me down for contiuing to question the fraud perpetuated in my dissmissal they completely failed to regonise the requirement of the protected disclosuse act

and part of telecoms codes of conduct are that you are responsible for keeping your self up to date with all laws

they did it to themselves

It is here, Hamlet.  Hamlet, thou art slain;
No medicine in the world can do thee good;
... The treacherous instrument is in thy hand."

- Shakespeare, Hamlet
 

my new approach

my placard 

Telecom staff commit fraud

Police complaint laid, accepted, validated

CEO informed Board informed

Nothing done

Inaction brings Telecom into disrepute

Code of ethics Yeah right  

http://hwyop.blogspot.co.nz

 http://www.change.org/en-AU/petitions/right-to-justice

 soon to be seen  a telecom shop near you 

simon moutter can talk to the media seen he refuses to talk to me  .the less he says the more they will ask 

  Be very aware  some if not all of the names below are the subject of a still open complaint for fraud with the Hamilton police

Bridgette Dalzell :current head of outsourced customer care at telecom New Zealand whom is Michelle Young's direct report at time of incident



Michelle Young :call centre manager Hamilton call centre, whom is Shaun Hoults direct report at time of incidents



Shaun Hoult: team manager weekend team Sat-Tues Hamilton



Iain Galloway HR representative for in Hamilton



Hannah Sullivan HR representative head office

<div id="change_BottomBar"><span id="change_Powered"><a href="http://www.change.org" target="_blank">Petitions</a> by Change.org</span><a>|</a><span id="change_Start">Start a <a href="http://www.change.org/petition" target="_blank">Petition</a> &raquo;</span></div>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://e.change.org/flash_petitions_widget.js?width=300&color=1A3563&petition_id=681556"></script>

after all this time

hi all telecom people 
i have been made aware that even after all this time 3 years 2 months rumours still exist and questions are still being asked about why i left telecom

all your answers can be found on my blog http://hwyop.blogspot.c...

o.nz/

you will be surprised to learn what occurred the short story

michelle young tried to discipline me a second time for a misdeamour that had already been dealt with

she was told politely that i couldn't happen in fact its illegal

she didn't like being challenged so escalated it national manager bridgette dalzell

she was told politely the same thing

she didn't like being challenged either

two weeks later is was called into a room by shaun and presented with a perfomace management plan that went back for months in retrspect ie back wards
yeap thats illegal as well

every little misdemeanor was highlighted even down to the fact i was 7 seconds in a work email while talking to a customer

i was required to be a 100%correct 100% of the time an impossible target that no one could achieve

so i was micro- manged a form of work place bullying

when i challenged them and advised that they as individuals not telecom were up for a $500.000.00 and 2 years jail they shit themselves

and issued a final written warning forced me to a mediation and the rest is history

however in amongst all this they committed fraud so i have laid a complain to the police i fount that out by requesting my full file via the privacy commission

i found out i was played and betrayed by all most everybody from debbie thru sheryl thru team leaders and members of my own team i have it all in thier own words fell free to vist an i will show you

at the moment the problem is waiting to be addressed at ministerial level

during the many discussions i had i was asked what i considered was a suitable punishment for my misdemeanours would be

i replied seen as one of the call center managers was caught screwing one of the team leaders in the small room on the sixth floor and nothing was done about it i considered a verbal warning was sufficient by the way they were both married but not to each other

needless to say that didn't co into the meeting notes funny that

See More

Hoist with your own petard

hwyop.blogspot.co.nz

•  

  Paul Evans-mcleod oh by the way check out my petition im in the process of sending it to every union in the country
  http://www.change.org/en-AU/petitions/right-to-justice

  

  Right to Justice

  www.change.org

  Petition Name: Right to justice Petition Instigator: Paul Evans-McLeod17 Minnie...

  Place, Pukete ,Te Rapa Hamilton New Zealand Phone 0064 7 8494584...

media reponses

Sent my open letter to 3 major dailies to advice of costing to run as an ad 

All responded and interestingly enough all wanted it passed on to their editorial sections YIPEEE

One is offering to re-write the add to avoid possible  charges which I’m not worried about cause I have no money and no asserts

So will telecom be more worried about their image or paying wages to the five that I caught committing fraud

 They have blocked me from talking to Simon Moutter

so stuff em all more than one way to skin a cat I over it I warned one of telecoms staff of my next move was the media obviously the message wasn’t passed on

interesting debate going on here



https://newzealandjustice.com/showthread.php?325-Right-to-justice-In-reality-its-a-myth&p=761#post761

do we tick all the boxes

A great equation  for corruption is

Corruption = Monopoly + Discretion – Accountability

do we tick all the boxes  yeap i think we do

over it

There are laws that have been broken in this saga, the trick is get someone to act ,have set in place various plans to achieve same

Have an appointment at my mps office on Monday to set in motion a plan to get the question raised on the floor of the house

When I know it happening will inform my media contacts

Telecom knows about the fraud but has so refused to act ,so i am over it ,they can answer to the media and be judged in the court of public opinion

have achieved my aim already they just dont have the brains to work out how

the ceo is aware of the matter we await the response

John

He is aware of the matter, I am confused therefore, why, he hasn’t, as required by telecom’s code of ethics (supported and backed by his board) acted on the breech by staff of their ethical and legal obligations

The wrong is required to be put right

The five participants committed fraud (by your own admission the relevant document does not exist)

I wish them to be held to account for their illegal act

Warm regards

Paul

From: John Rooney [mailto:John.Rooney@simpsongrierson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2012 11:56 a.m.
To: 'Paul Mcleod'
Subject: RE: confirmation [SG-SGDMS.FID361431]

Dear Paul,

We refer to your emails of 6 September, the contents of which are noted. The new CEO is aware of this matter.

We have been asked to remind you that all correspondence and communications are to be directed to us.

Regards
John Rooney
Partner
Simpson Grierson
Level 27, 88 Shortland Street, Private Bag 92518, Auckland, New Zealand
DDI +64-9-977 5070 | Fax +64-9-977 5083 | Mobile +64-21 499 365john.rooney@simpsongrierson.com | www.simpsongrierson.com

 

From: Paul Mcleod [mailto:paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Thursday, 6 September 2012 5:57 p.m.
To: John Rooney
Subject: confirmation

John

On review, the previous letter require more clarity

Question being asked by those taking an intense interest in this case is

Is the new Ceo aware of this, its implications, and a chance to respond

Hence my need for confirmation

warm  regards

Paul

17 Minnie Place

Pukete

Te Rapa

Hamilton

New Zealand

Phone 0064 7 8494584

Mobile 0272423222

Paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz

letter sent to domion post among others

letter sent to domion post among others
Hi

Remember this
http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/3415928/I-was-bullied-says-call-centre-staffer

...

Well if I were bullied unfortunately you where conned by telecom and thier media pr machine

After nearly four decades of service to a major corporate Telecom I found myself micro-managed out of a job and constructively dismissed, subsequent enquires elicited the fact that fraud formed part of management’s case
Holding them to account as indeed prove a trail which has amazed and amuzed me
The lengths a corporate goes in terms of perpetuating the fraud by legal means and the cost of that ,The principles of law inherent in the case and the corporate thumbing their nose at legal requirements The corporate approach to mediation process and their HR’s manipulation of it.
The impact on employment law should disciplinary actions be required to be verified as truthful and accurate and able to proven and presented as such (should cost prevent justice, and truth)

The validity of stated corporate ethics, their proponent’s responsibilities and adherence to the stated beliefs and values
The corporate morality exposed by the condoning of swingers sex on work time and work premises, (as no action taken) verses please produce the letter (a simple request ) , and involve lawyers , HR to deny and confound The time and money spend on ignoring my requests against a simple act of requesting the letter be presented
Where does the power really rest with the law, with the government or with the corporate and where does the impact the average person in the street,The responses of government agencies to the problem, deemed too hard and the disingenuous response bureaucratic ping pong into a catch 22 situation

What does the demonstrated values of both the corporate and the government in this case say about their real concern for either their public, their staff or their citizens (by their own words you shall know them) Whom displays the integrity the individual going slowly through the prescribed process, to have his intelligence insulted with patronising responses.

The essence of the case is simple request the letter, produce the letter ,,,,all that it is based on after that is a lie. Whom is really accountable within corporate....is there a deliberate strategy to blur the actions and paths to appropriate resolution

Whom is really accountable within government and their agencies Whom determines when a law is broken and evidence produced whether that is pursued , is the law the law or those tasked with its enforcement be that government agencies or the police able to determine their jurisprudence which is really the place of the courts

It follows that if those who want to stop or impede the abuse of power (or those who are charged with this duty) do not have sufficient power (even if it were only moral power), they and their efforts will only serve as a source of amusement to those who abuse it. However with the judicious use of the internet it will be found that sin indeed casts a long shadow ,does the ceo know there are bad apples contaminating the barrel

The crux of the case, disciplinary proceedings were commenced on the basis of a written letter customer compliant which was not produced when asked for and was acknowledged subsequently by Telecoms lawyer from Simpson Grierson as not existing
at all. Hence it is a fraud, knowingly acted on by all within Telecom, that impacted on my legal and human rights..

A complaint to the police has be laid and assigned a number which validates my allegations

The above attachments proves my bona fides

Simon moutter is the new CEO I strongly suggest you deal directly with him least you get managed again ring 0800801080

The participants in this debacle are
Bridgette Dalzell :current head of outsourced customer care at telecom New Zealand whom is Michelle Young's direct report at time of incident
Michelle Young :call centre manager Hamilton call centre, whom is Shaun Hoults direct report at time of incidents
Shaun Hoult: team manager weekend team Sat-Tues Hamilton
Iain Galloway HR representative for in Hamilton
Hannah Sullivan HR representative head office


perhaps you could contact them directly

been a fun day

been a fun day

Over it Frans

But thank you for the courtesy of replying

Have advised the news paper contact to publish and be dammed have contacted all major dallies

I am now pursing the share holder register expect pointed questions at the next agm

I fear three newspapers more than a hundred thousand bayonets.”

-Napoleon Bonaparte
A dictator like Napoleon Bonaparte would have every reason to fear a free press, because it arms citizens with essential information-the truth,

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. ...Arthur Schopenhauer

Consider why I would correspond with a lawyer who by his own admission in writing has admitted the letter concerned does not exist
And his monotonous response is” we will not enter into any further correspondence” this over a clear case of fraud

This insults my intelligence I am well aware the strategy of the corporate is to continuously send stuff round and round until you get pissed off enough to stop, hence everything is via John Ronney whom handles all correspondence and basically replies with a FO letter.

“We have been advised by our client of your recent contact with Simon Mouter's office. We have therefore been instructed to once again remind you that all communications, enquiries etc are to be made through us. Direct approaches to Telecom and any of its employees and officers will not be responded to.””

Unfortunately this response to an editor will only heighten his resolve to get to the truth

Why should I have trust in my management structure when over time I have written evidence of their lies signed off a true and correct record?

John Rooney threatened me with defamation re Bridgette Dalzell my response bring it on and showed him just a nibble of what I had; he had the good sense to back off

Have you actually forwarded my attachments to Simon Moutter for comment I strongly suggest you do, as it is his brand and telecoms image that are going to be impacted and he is going be very embarrassed by the actions of some of his staff so early in his tenure

I have offered telecom a olive branch and it has be spurned, Telecom insult me with patronising responses. Fortunately I now have four large folders of them
With no assets to my name all I have left is the power of the press

Warm regards

Paul

From: Frans van Zoggel [mailto:Frans.vanZoggel@telecom.co.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, 5 September 2012 11:09 a.m.
To: 'Paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz'
Subject: Paul Evans-McLeod re: your voicemail

Mr Evans-McLeod,

Thank you for your voicemail.

To answer your queries:
• Yes, I have forwarded your concerns to the appropriate people.
• Yes, Simon Moutter is aware of your contact ( you spoke with his Executive Assistant on Monday)
• You did say you would forward the Police complaint, but this hasn't been received as yet, please forward this directly to John Rooney.
Moving forward, any contact you wish to make in respects of these matters MUST be referred to Telecom's Solicitor, John Rooney ONLY.



Regards





Frans van Zoggel
Customer Champion
Operational Regulatory Group - Telecom Retail
T
M
E 03 353 5085 (0800 10 80 10 extn 32085)
027 2800 922

nope they still havent worked it out yet

So there you have it Chris

We have a clear case of fraud admitted to in written correspondence which they refuse to acknowledge or respond to as required by their own code of ethics and possibliy by law

This correspondence is in direct response to me ringing Simon Mouters office to have a direct conversation with HIM  regarding fraud within his own company

I suspect the client is actually a HR wonk covering his back side perhaps Simon Mouter is unaware of what is being with held

Perhaps your papers lawyers may want to deal with him directly

SO PUBLISH AND BE DAMED I SAY OR WE WILL WAIT FOR THE QUESTION IN THE HOUSE YOUR CALL FILL YOUR BOOTS IAM ALSO CONSIDERING STARTING A PETITON

From: John Rooney [mailto:John.Rooney@simpsongrierson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 4 September 2012 4:10 p.m.
To: 'Paul Mcleod'
Subject: RE: my story [SG-SGDMS.FID361431]

Dear Paul,

We have been advised by our client of your recent contact with Simon Mouter's office. We have therefore been instructed to once again remind you that all communications, enquiries etc are to be made through us. Direct approaches to Telecom and any of its employees and officers will not be  responded to.

Regards
John Rooney
Partner
Simpson Grierson
Level 27, 88 Shortland Street, Private Bag 92518, Auckland, New Zealand
DDI +64-9-977 5070 | Fax +64-9-977 5083 | Mobile +64-21 499 365john.rooney@simpsongrierson.com | www.simpsongrierson.com

 

From: Paul Mcleod [mailto:paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012 11:14 p.m.
To: 'Chris Gardner (Waikato Times)'
Cc: John Rooney
Subject: RE: my story

Hi chris

The fraud is not alleged it is proven admitted by telecoms own lawyer  

Short story

After 39 years 3 months I was micromanaged out of my job 

Among the misdemeanours I was disciplined for was a complaint by a 15 year old IHC girl I had dealt with who had supposedly written to telecom herself to complain that in dealing with her that I was “condescending patronising and rude “this was written in meeting notes signed of by my team leader and my site manager as a true and correct record

After being constructively dismissed I decided that things needed a bit more research I realised that without denigrating her disability a 15 IHC girl couldn’t understand the concept of

Condescending patronising and rude let alone convey it to any other adult

so I asked for all notes on me via principle e seven of the privacy act  

this letter from the above 15 ihc girl was not in the notes so I asked again and again specifically for the letter ,eventually their layer john Rooney of Simpson grieson.  admitted  under

Any additional information is therefore withheld under section 29(2)(b) on the basis that it does not exist.

Please read attachment letter is send to the head of the cib

So telecom used fraud to get me into a disciplinary matter

Once discovered and acknowledged I asked

Does the fraud discovered and acknowledged nullffily all that occurred from that document  so re instate me

 is fraud allowed in a disciplinary  proceeded

Seriously email John.Rooney@simon grieson.com

indicated you are a reporter indicate you are enquiring about  a case of fraud with relevant to my case tell him I given permission for you to have the letter he wont be able to produce it

because in his own writing therefore withheld under section 29(2)(b) on the basis that it does not exist.

Tell him you awriting a major expose

So  I have a police complaint.so the police concur and validate my concern that it is a crime but nobody wants to deal with it

Cheers paul

From: Chris Gardner (Waikato Times) [mailto:Chris.Gardner@WaikatoTimes.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012 4:55 p.m.
To: 'Paul Mcleod'
Subject: RE: my story

Hi Paul

Ok, thanks.

So what's the fraud you're alleging?

Perhaps talk to Sue and ask her to ring me when you do.

Regards

Chris Gardner

Technology Editor

(Also covering the energy sector and Waitomo and Otorohanga districts in the King Country)

Waikato Times

Physical Address: 70 Foreman Road, Te Rapa, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand

Postal Address: Private Bag 3086, Hamilton, New Zealand

Phone: +64 7 849 9612

Cell phone: +64 27  231 7007

Fax: +64 7 849 9603

Email: Chris.Gardner@waikatotimes.co.nz

Website: www.waikatotimes.co.nz

Twitter: @iTimesEditor

Join us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

A member of the Fairfax Media group and a division of Fairfax New Zealand limited.

From: Paul Mcleod [mailto:paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012 4:47 p.m.
To: Chris Gardner (Waikato Times)
Subject: RE: my story

Hi Chris

Currently no action at all, the minister rather than instructing her people to deal with it ,just sends it to the commissioner, the commissioner can’t be bothered ,send sit back to the head of Hamilton district he can’t be bothered either

So nobody is acting on it  

Monday I am ringing Sue moroney  mp  for another appointment to find out her next step is ,you may want to incorporate her views into an article .it may well be her next step is a question in the house I am happy for you to talk to her about my issue

The angle this time is not that I was bullied that was the angle last time, but the fact I found them, out committing fraud ,they have acknowledged the letter of complaint never did exist

I have a police complaint .so the police concur and validate my concern that it is a crime but nobody wants to deal with it

Even an article embarrassing them about it would help

Simon Mounter becomes the new ceo as of this month he may not want this sort of crap on his desk

Cheer Paul

From: Chris Gardner (Waikato Times) [mailto:Chris.Gardner@WaikatoTimes.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012 2:22 p.m.
To: 'Paul Mcleod'
Subject: RE: my story

Hi

Still trying to ascertain the fresh angle.

What's the latest on it?

Regards

Chris Gardner

Technology Editor

(Also covering the energy sector and Waitomo and Otorohanga districts in the King Country)

Waikato Times

Physical Address: 70 Foreman Road, Te Rapa, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand

Postal Address: Private Bag 3086, Hamilton, New Zealand

Phone: +64 7 849 9612

Cell phone: +64 27  231 7007

Fax: +64 7 849 9603

Email: Chris.Gardner@waikatotimes.co.nz

Website: www.waikatotimes.co.nz

Twitter: @iTimesEditor

Join us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

A member of the Fairfax Media group and a division of Fairfax New Zealand limited.

From: Paul Mcleod [mailto:paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Saturday, 1 September 2012 11:37 a.m.
To: Chris Gardner (Waikato Times)
Subject: my story

Hi

Chris I was unsuccessful in my job application so feel free to go ahead with my story whenever you feel like it