Tuesday, April 17, 2012

FINAL COUNTDOWN

John

Please email to the following people

 Bridgette Dalzell, Michelle Young, Shaun Hoult, Iain Galloway .Hannah Sullivan Alan Gourdie, Paul Reynolds

You are advised that by the receipt of this email 8 printed copies sent by post  have reached the desks of board members as well as Trish Keith: GM
Tristan Gilbertson: Group General Counsel

You are also reminded that a complaint has been lodged with the Head of the CIB Hamilton

The complaint is still open .however remind yourselves that for the complaint to even considered, there must be a belief it has some foundation to it




To members of the board


Quite simply I am offering you an opportunity to right a wrong

Telecoms code of ethics are supported and approved by the board, whom are required to facilitate decisions that are consistent with telecoms legal obligations. 

Are Telecoms’ code of ethics are a crock, meaningless words, that they fail to implement, or in reality fail to support?

Staff behaviours require they conduct themselves in a way that demonstrates that their honesty is beyond question and will not risk behaviours that have the potential to bring telecoms image into disrepute 
This has been demonstrated, by a portion of your staff, to have failed on all counts

I am in the process of taken them to task for fraud via lawyers and the CIB 

I have detailed records
in their own hand sourced via the privacy act 

Reference
s indicating letters of complaint in meeting notes, signed off as a true and correct record 

Confirmation that one of the complaint letters, in fact, did not exist, that equals fraud, this from Telecoms their lawyer John Rooney, via privacy commissioner

Privacy commissioner acknowledges

Telecom’s responses in terms of why it considers it have already provided you with these documents, to the extent that they exist. As previously advised Telecom is entitled to refuse a request for information which does not exist under section 29(2)(b).
“this portion refers to the letter that was supposedly written customer complaint by the handicap girl who said I was “condescending patronising and rude” they are therefore admitting fraud in the disciplinary process” 

A letter from the
Minister of Employment confirming it is a police matter or serious fraud matter it is therefore not an employment matter nullified by the agreement signed off at mediation 
Regarding your allegations of fraud, as I advised in my previous letter, your best option is to pursue legal advice to determine the options available to you in this situation.

In the case of fraudulent activity. I encourage you to bring this matter to the attention of the Police. Once they have considered your case, the Police can, if necessary, bring this matter to the attention of the Serious Fraud Office.

A letter from the
Minister of Police indicating it has been forwarded to police commissioner 

Complaint laid with Head of CIB Complaint Case 111129/9892

Logic dictates that if it was covered under the mediation agreement the
Minister of labour would not have progressed it to the police or advised me it is a matter for the police and serious fraud office 
All participants in this protracted fraud are in my view culpable under the law. As it is part of their job requirements to make themselves fully cognisant with all the laws of the land it is an integral part of their job descriptions


Bridgette Dalzell: National Manager Telecom:  who had oversight of the process as her role dictates?
Michelle Young Site manager 123 Call Centre Hamilton (Bridgette Dalzell is Michelle's manager)
Shaun Hoult my Team Leader (Michelle Young is his manager) 
Iain Galloway Site Human Resource Manager
Hannah Sullivan Head office Human Resource


This can all be resolved by the board honouring their commitments as prescribed under the telecom code of ethics   

My personal thoughts are that this matter can be resolved extremely quickly, contact each of the participants and ask one simple question

In fact you can resolve it from your desk simply email them all at the following


Stating the following

I am in receipt of a letter of complaint from a Paul Evans-McLeod alleging fraud

Fraud is an indictable offense. All participants are liable to a term of imprisonment

The allegations with the supporting documents appears to satisfy all the elements of fraud

Can you produce the complaint letter referred to in numerous notes of the disciplinary meetings performance meetings, outcome meetings, written warning, final writing warnings held with Paul Evans-Mcleod?  

Specifically the written complaint letter referred to, is the one held to have been written by the handicapped person describing him as patronising condescending and rude

A simple answer of yes or no will suffice I

The answer is no, they won’t be able to, they have admitted same to the privacy commission  


But no I am being forced to lodge a police complaint to resolve this issue. Telecom is content to use the power of it resources and their high price legal consul to avoid addressing the issue

My recourse, besides the legal avenues, via the media both social and print, in addition to Member of Parliament requesting raising a question in the house (all in progress)

What am I asking of the board is nothing more than you act according to the principles of the code of ethics
Nothing more nothing less

Once you act things will take care of themselves  

I seek only what is fair and just, compensation, reinstatement, a written apology from each participant admitting the fraud and their role in it   

So the choice is yours to act to, right this wrong or not, the consequences of your actions will be published on my blog and various social media sites

If required we will proceed to court where the truth will be revealed as dictated above, finally in an environment where people will face the consequences of their actions

It is indeed unfortunate that my current enquires via social media, an Open letter to all ex-telecom employees who worked at the 123 telecom call centre located in the ASB building 500 Victoria Street 

I am interested in hearing from any of you, who were disciplined and forced out the company of the basis of customer complaints
Currently I have a complaint of fraud against five members of telecom alleging dishonesty in the form of a customer complaint that in fact didn’t exist this complaint is held by the CIB at Hamilton police station awaiting progress
This complaint still remains open allowing me to gather more information to support my claim I have had several enquires where people are concerned the same was instigated against them


Have elicited others that have been treated the same as well direct inquires from print media as to whether I am pursuing a civil suit

What a coincidence that we share the same call centre manager and national manager overseeing the disciplinary action


I suffered psychological abuse over 81/2 months with this nonsense, medical people have advised I could now  have a life threatening concern, my personal physician has advised  I have developed PTSD  as a result of the stress I was put thru

I gave 39 and 1/4 years to your company; this was not the way I anticipated leaving

I was more than happy to be judged among my peers asking for no special favours neither expecting them

However my own personal codes of ethics deems that I will not allow my personal reputation for honesty and integrity to be sullied by the actions of those whose concept of same bear no reality to their actions


In addition

This has been forwarded as well

Please forward this to

Trish Keith: GM
Tristan Gilbertson: Group General Counsel

Please ask them for an acknowledgement, of receipt of this email and removal of block to their email so I can communicate with them

Telecom committed fraud, Telecom admitted it, and Telecom acknowledged it, a complaint letter didn’t exist, never had

I have highlighted this fraud to them time and time again, written letters to everybody in Telecom all have read about it, from the CEO down 

Yet none have acted and disciplined the people for the fraud, not ever

That is the story the print media are asking about, they currently have copies of same 

Telecom is unable to deny it
Telecom having acknowledged it. An illegal act, are required to act
They have been given one last chance to right the wrong
They have been advised of an illegal act and they have done nothing, absolutely nothing, they broke the law, I didn’t, yet I’m the one without a job

This illegal “behaviour that have the potential to bring telecoms image into disrepute” your own code of ethics  


Warm regards
Paul
17 Minnie Place
Pukete
Te Rapa
Hamilton
New Zealand

Phone 0064 7 8494584
Mobile 0272423017




No comments:

Post a Comment