over it

There are laws that have been broken in this saga, the trick is get someone to act ,have set in place various plans to achieve same

Have an appointment at my mps office on Monday to set in motion a plan to get the question raised on the floor of the house

When I know it happening will inform my media contacts

Telecom knows about the fraud but has so refused to act ,so i am over it ,they can answer to the media and be judged in the court of public opinion

have achieved my aim already they just dont have the brains to work out how

the ceo is aware of the matter we await the response

John

He is aware of the matter, I am confused therefore, why, he hasn’t, as required by telecom’s code of ethics (supported and backed by his board) acted on the breech by staff of their ethical and legal obligations

The wrong is required to be put right

The five participants committed fraud (by your own admission the relevant document does not exist)

I wish them to be held to account for their illegal act

Warm regards

Paul

From: John Rooney [mailto:John.Rooney@simpsongrierson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2012 11:56 a.m.
To: 'Paul Mcleod'
Subject: RE: confirmation [SG-SGDMS.FID361431]

Dear Paul,

We refer to your emails of 6 September, the contents of which are noted. The new CEO is aware of this matter.

We have been asked to remind you that all correspondence and communications are to be directed to us.

Regards
John Rooney
Partner
Simpson Grierson
Level 27, 88 Shortland Street, Private Bag 92518, Auckland, New Zealand
DDI +64-9-977 5070 | Fax +64-9-977 5083 | Mobile +64-21 499 365john.rooney@simpsongrierson.com | www.simpsongrierson.com

 

From: Paul Mcleod [mailto:paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Thursday, 6 September 2012 5:57 p.m.
To: John Rooney
Subject: confirmation

John

On review, the previous letter require more clarity

Question being asked by those taking an intense interest in this case is

Is the new Ceo aware of this, its implications, and a chance to respond

Hence my need for confirmation

warm  regards

Paul

17 Minnie Place

Pukete

Te Rapa

Hamilton

New Zealand

Phone 0064 7 8494584

Mobile 0272423222

Paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz

letter sent to domion post among others

letter sent to domion post among others
Hi

Remember this
http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/3415928/I-was-bullied-says-call-centre-staffer

...

Well if I were bullied unfortunately you where conned by telecom and thier media pr machine

After nearly four decades of service to a major corporate Telecom I found myself micro-managed out of a job and constructively dismissed, subsequent enquires elicited the fact that fraud formed part of management’s case
Holding them to account as indeed prove a trail which has amazed and amuzed me
The lengths a corporate goes in terms of perpetuating the fraud by legal means and the cost of that ,The principles of law inherent in the case and the corporate thumbing their nose at legal requirements The corporate approach to mediation process and their HR’s manipulation of it.
The impact on employment law should disciplinary actions be required to be verified as truthful and accurate and able to proven and presented as such (should cost prevent justice, and truth)

The validity of stated corporate ethics, their proponent’s responsibilities and adherence to the stated beliefs and values
The corporate morality exposed by the condoning of swingers sex on work time and work premises, (as no action taken) verses please produce the letter (a simple request ) , and involve lawyers , HR to deny and confound The time and money spend on ignoring my requests against a simple act of requesting the letter be presented
Where does the power really rest with the law, with the government or with the corporate and where does the impact the average person in the street,The responses of government agencies to the problem, deemed too hard and the disingenuous response bureaucratic ping pong into a catch 22 situation

What does the demonstrated values of both the corporate and the government in this case say about their real concern for either their public, their staff or their citizens (by their own words you shall know them) Whom displays the integrity the individual going slowly through the prescribed process, to have his intelligence insulted with patronising responses.

The essence of the case is simple request the letter, produce the letter ,,,,all that it is based on after that is a lie. Whom is really accountable within corporate....is there a deliberate strategy to blur the actions and paths to appropriate resolution

Whom is really accountable within government and their agencies Whom determines when a law is broken and evidence produced whether that is pursued , is the law the law or those tasked with its enforcement be that government agencies or the police able to determine their jurisprudence which is really the place of the courts

It follows that if those who want to stop or impede the abuse of power (or those who are charged with this duty) do not have sufficient power (even if it were only moral power), they and their efforts will only serve as a source of amusement to those who abuse it. However with the judicious use of the internet it will be found that sin indeed casts a long shadow ,does the ceo know there are bad apples contaminating the barrel

The crux of the case, disciplinary proceedings were commenced on the basis of a written letter customer compliant which was not produced when asked for and was acknowledged subsequently by Telecoms lawyer from Simpson Grierson as not existing
at all. Hence it is a fraud, knowingly acted on by all within Telecom, that impacted on my legal and human rights..

A complaint to the police has be laid and assigned a number which validates my allegations

The above attachments proves my bona fides

Simon moutter is the new CEO I strongly suggest you deal directly with him least you get managed again ring 0800801080

The participants in this debacle are
Bridgette Dalzell :current head of outsourced customer care at telecom New Zealand whom is Michelle Young's direct report at time of incident
Michelle Young :call centre manager Hamilton call centre, whom is Shaun Hoults direct report at time of incidents
Shaun Hoult: team manager weekend team Sat-Tues Hamilton
Iain Galloway HR representative for in Hamilton
Hannah Sullivan HR representative head office


perhaps you could contact them directly

been a fun day

been a fun day

Over it Frans

But thank you for the courtesy of replying

Have advised the news paper contact to publish and be dammed have contacted all major dallies

I am now pursing the share holder register expect pointed questions at the next agm

I fear three newspapers more than a hundred thousand bayonets.”

-Napoleon Bonaparte
A dictator like Napoleon Bonaparte would have every reason to fear a free press, because it arms citizens with essential information-the truth,

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. ...Arthur Schopenhauer

Consider why I would correspond with a lawyer who by his own admission in writing has admitted the letter concerned does not exist
And his monotonous response is” we will not enter into any further correspondence” this over a clear case of fraud

This insults my intelligence I am well aware the strategy of the corporate is to continuously send stuff round and round until you get pissed off enough to stop, hence everything is via John Ronney whom handles all correspondence and basically replies with a FO letter.

“We have been advised by our client of your recent contact with Simon Mouter's office. We have therefore been instructed to once again remind you that all communications, enquiries etc are to be made through us. Direct approaches to Telecom and any of its employees and officers will not be responded to.””

Unfortunately this response to an editor will only heighten his resolve to get to the truth

Why should I have trust in my management structure when over time I have written evidence of their lies signed off a true and correct record?

John Rooney threatened me with defamation re Bridgette Dalzell my response bring it on and showed him just a nibble of what I had; he had the good sense to back off

Have you actually forwarded my attachments to Simon Moutter for comment I strongly suggest you do, as it is his brand and telecoms image that are going to be impacted and he is going be very embarrassed by the actions of some of his staff so early in his tenure

I have offered telecom a olive branch and it has be spurned, Telecom insult me with patronising responses. Fortunately I now have four large folders of them
With no assets to my name all I have left is the power of the press

Warm regards

Paul

From: Frans van Zoggel [mailto:Frans.vanZoggel@telecom.co.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, 5 September 2012 11:09 a.m.
To: 'Paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz'
Subject: Paul Evans-McLeod re: your voicemail

Mr Evans-McLeod,

Thank you for your voicemail.

To answer your queries:
• Yes, I have forwarded your concerns to the appropriate people.
• Yes, Simon Moutter is aware of your contact ( you spoke with his Executive Assistant on Monday)
• You did say you would forward the Police complaint, but this hasn't been received as yet, please forward this directly to John Rooney.
Moving forward, any contact you wish to make in respects of these matters MUST be referred to Telecom's Solicitor, John Rooney ONLY.



Regards





Frans van Zoggel
Customer Champion
Operational Regulatory Group - Telecom Retail
T
M
E 03 353 5085 (0800 10 80 10 extn 32085)
027 2800 922

nope they still havent worked it out yet

So there you have it Chris

We have a clear case of fraud admitted to in written correspondence which they refuse to acknowledge or respond to as required by their own code of ethics and possibliy by law

This correspondence is in direct response to me ringing Simon Mouters office to have a direct conversation with HIM  regarding fraud within his own company

I suspect the client is actually a HR wonk covering his back side perhaps Simon Mouter is unaware of what is being with held

Perhaps your papers lawyers may want to deal with him directly

SO PUBLISH AND BE DAMED I SAY OR WE WILL WAIT FOR THE QUESTION IN THE HOUSE YOUR CALL FILL YOUR BOOTS IAM ALSO CONSIDERING STARTING A PETITON

From: John Rooney [mailto:John.Rooney@simpsongrierson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 4 September 2012 4:10 p.m.
To: 'Paul Mcleod'
Subject: RE: my story [SG-SGDMS.FID361431]

Dear Paul,

We have been advised by our client of your recent contact with Simon Mouter's office. We have therefore been instructed to once again remind you that all communications, enquiries etc are to be made through us. Direct approaches to Telecom and any of its employees and officers will not be  responded to.

Regards
John Rooney
Partner
Simpson Grierson
Level 27, 88 Shortland Street, Private Bag 92518, Auckland, New Zealand
DDI +64-9-977 5070 | Fax +64-9-977 5083 | Mobile +64-21 499 365john.rooney@simpsongrierson.com | www.simpsongrierson.com

 

From: Paul Mcleod [mailto:paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012 11:14 p.m.
To: 'Chris Gardner (Waikato Times)'
Cc: John Rooney
Subject: RE: my story

Hi chris

The fraud is not alleged it is proven admitted by telecoms own lawyer  

Short story

After 39 years 3 months I was micromanaged out of my job 

Among the misdemeanours I was disciplined for was a complaint by a 15 year old IHC girl I had dealt with who had supposedly written to telecom herself to complain that in dealing with her that I was “condescending patronising and rude “this was written in meeting notes signed of by my team leader and my site manager as a true and correct record

After being constructively dismissed I decided that things needed a bit more research I realised that without denigrating her disability a 15 IHC girl couldn’t understand the concept of

Condescending patronising and rude let alone convey it to any other adult

so I asked for all notes on me via principle e seven of the privacy act  

this letter from the above 15 ihc girl was not in the notes so I asked again and again specifically for the letter ,eventually their layer john Rooney of Simpson grieson.  admitted  under

Any additional information is therefore withheld under section 29(2)(b) on the basis that it does not exist.

Please read attachment letter is send to the head of the cib

So telecom used fraud to get me into a disciplinary matter

Once discovered and acknowledged I asked

Does the fraud discovered and acknowledged nullffily all that occurred from that document  so re instate me

 is fraud allowed in a disciplinary  proceeded

Seriously email John.Rooney@simon grieson.com

indicated you are a reporter indicate you are enquiring about  a case of fraud with relevant to my case tell him I given permission for you to have the letter he wont be able to produce it

because in his own writing therefore withheld under section 29(2)(b) on the basis that it does not exist.

Tell him you awriting a major expose

So  I have a police complaint.so the police concur and validate my concern that it is a crime but nobody wants to deal with it

Cheers paul

From: Chris Gardner (Waikato Times) [mailto:Chris.Gardner@WaikatoTimes.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012 4:55 p.m.
To: 'Paul Mcleod'
Subject: RE: my story

Hi Paul

Ok, thanks.

So what's the fraud you're alleging?

Perhaps talk to Sue and ask her to ring me when you do.

Regards

Chris Gardner

Technology Editor

(Also covering the energy sector and Waitomo and Otorohanga districts in the King Country)

Waikato Times

Physical Address: 70 Foreman Road, Te Rapa, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand

Postal Address: Private Bag 3086, Hamilton, New Zealand

Phone: +64 7 849 9612

Cell phone: +64 27  231 7007

Fax: +64 7 849 9603

Email: Chris.Gardner@waikatotimes.co.nz

Website: www.waikatotimes.co.nz

Twitter: @iTimesEditor

Join us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

A member of the Fairfax Media group and a division of Fairfax New Zealand limited.

From: Paul Mcleod [mailto:paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012 4:47 p.m.
To: Chris Gardner (Waikato Times)
Subject: RE: my story

Hi Chris

Currently no action at all, the minister rather than instructing her people to deal with it ,just sends it to the commissioner, the commissioner can’t be bothered ,send sit back to the head of Hamilton district he can’t be bothered either

So nobody is acting on it  

Monday I am ringing Sue moroney  mp  for another appointment to find out her next step is ,you may want to incorporate her views into an article .it may well be her next step is a question in the house I am happy for you to talk to her about my issue

The angle this time is not that I was bullied that was the angle last time, but the fact I found them, out committing fraud ,they have acknowledged the letter of complaint never did exist

I have a police complaint .so the police concur and validate my concern that it is a crime but nobody wants to deal with it

Even an article embarrassing them about it would help

Simon Mounter becomes the new ceo as of this month he may not want this sort of crap on his desk

Cheer Paul

From: Chris Gardner (Waikato Times) [mailto:Chris.Gardner@WaikatoTimes.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012 2:22 p.m.
To: 'Paul Mcleod'
Subject: RE: my story

Hi

Still trying to ascertain the fresh angle.

What's the latest on it?

Regards

Chris Gardner

Technology Editor

(Also covering the energy sector and Waitomo and Otorohanga districts in the King Country)

Waikato Times

Physical Address: 70 Foreman Road, Te Rapa, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand

Postal Address: Private Bag 3086, Hamilton, New Zealand

Phone: +64 7 849 9612

Cell phone: +64 27  231 7007

Fax: +64 7 849 9603

Email: Chris.Gardner@waikatotimes.co.nz

Website: www.waikatotimes.co.nz

Twitter: @iTimesEditor

Join us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

A member of the Fairfax Media group and a division of Fairfax New Zealand limited.

From: Paul Mcleod [mailto:paul.evans-mcleod@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Saturday, 1 September 2012 11:37 a.m.
To: Chris Gardner (Waikato Times)
Subject: my story

Hi

Chris I was unsuccessful in my job application so feel free to go ahead with my story whenever you feel like it

my conundrum

In  a corporate environment , where swingers sex, on work time , in work premises, is ignored, but a false letter of complaint is used to micro manage out those whom have served loyally for almost four decades , how does one seek recourse for this injustice, in this a free and democratic society.

Does the rule of law suffice, does documented evidence have credence, is protection from government departments charged with policing policies and statues provided.

Not under this government.

Bureaucratic ping pong, where the crime is acknowledged by both agencies , but deemed the others responsibility is the disingenuous response.

The corporate lawyer acknowledges the perpetuated falsehood, but reinforces the HR spin with no expense spared, damn the impudence of those ‘whom should know their place’ and should just comply with the forced expulsion.

Whom now  lies exposed, the injured party surrounded by the paperwork of all those complicit in this deceit, and the pawns in the government department stepping in time to the corporate drum beat, with their formal well phrased denials on official letterheads now filed and indexed indentifying the misplaced credence of those in authority whom serve to protect...yeah right....  but we now have it all on record, let’s bring it out of the shadows and into the sunlight, and let the deniers file their claims to dispute their own written word

Three years today .time for a vent

Today marks the third year anniversary of my exit from Telecom achieved in part with a fraudulent document which was consequently found to be non –existent

The five people named in my blog are the subject of a police complaint laid with the head of the CIB in Hamilton, the acceptance of this complaint serves to give validity to my claims of fraud

The Minister of Labour the highest authority in the land in regard to employment law deems it a crime , requiring the attention of the serious fraud office and the police
...

A local MP has offered their support currently a investigation letter rests on the Minister of Justice desk asking for it to be addressed at ministerial level

it is a crime and it will be addressed

Sin casts a long shadow .especially on the internet, your children, and your children’s children etc etc will discover documents signed off by yourselves as true and correct records

That shows all for what you really are, people who lack honesty and integrity

Parents suffer no greater pain then the looks of disappointment and disgust in the eyes of their children that perhaps will be my reward

the same applies for your staff as they percieve loyalty trust honesty and integrity are not values held by management as always my blog is http://hwyop.blogspot.co.nz/

The fraud that was committed was they used my conversation with an ihc girl who had run up a huge bill talking to her boy friend, the type of person most in the call centre would have flicked off .It was a challenging conversation but all was resolved in the end to everybodys satisfaction

However because my team leader Shaun Hoult was being pushed the site manager Michelle Young and national manager Bridgett Dalzell to micro-manage me out
...

The told me in notes signed of as true and correct records that this intellectually handicapped girl had complained that I was condescending, patronising .and rude

At that point very early in the disciplinary procedure I knew I was being lied to by my managers

Without denigrating the young lady’s disability she lacks the intellectual capacity to form and understand the concepts of condescending and patronising
Test explain to me the difference between the two not easy is it

We don’t need to change the teacher to fix this we just need to hold them accountable for their fraud as they all lack the moral fibre to hold themselves accountable .this one act taints thier position and their souls they may well live to regret it

 

i will continue to persue them till they are held accountable  once held accountable i will then move to disrupt thier lives in a way they will never see coming or imagine and do so legally