Telecom has appointed an independent party to investigate the debacle but shareholders should be demanding answers to a number of basic questions, including:
did the company have an open and contestable tender process for the construction of the XT Network? why was Alcatel Lucent appointed? Was the appointment based on price or some other issue?
Did Telecom comprehensively test the XT Network before it was launched? Thats a good question
Why was the XT Network aggressively marketed before it was completed?
Why is there no reliable backup when the system fails? Another good question
Question
why where employees who questioned some aspects of the launch aggressively quashed at the behest of their national managers when they voiced their concerns and then in a formal written warning told
“ It is your responsibility to ensure that you fully participate positively in all training sessions, team meetings and associated events; you are to support your colleagues, your team leader and the trainer.”
“If you seek the counsel of yes men you reap the wisdom of mediocrity”
The one that are question your actions are at least thinking about it and are engaged in the process with you
Welcome to mediocre service people
Disclosure of interest; yes I’m an ex-employee micro-managed out as of august 20 2009 after 39 years 3 months
Where my loyalty it was all ways there until it was shown to have no value
two guess,s who the national manager was
To all
This blog has been in play for some months to gain the full story go to left hand side go to bottom post and read upwards
No comments:
Post a Comment